DoD's $628M MRAP Contract with BAE Systems: Full and Open Competition, Firm Fixed Price

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $627,833,616 ($627.8M)

Contractor: BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-12-18

End Date: 2012-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,595 days

Daily Burn Rate: $393.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: CATEGORY II MRAP

Place of Performance

Location: YORK, YORK County, PENNSYLVANIA, 17405

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $627.8 million to BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P. for work described as: CATEGORY II MRAP Key points: 1. Significant investment in armored vehicle technology. 2. BAE Systems is a major defense contractor. 3. Contract awarded under full and open competition. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award value of $627.8M over approximately 5 years suggests a substantial program. Without specific unit pricing or comparison to similar MRAP variants, a precise value assessment is difficult, but the scale indicates significant procurement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating multiple bidders were considered. This competitive process is expected to drive better pricing and value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is intended to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential military equipment.

Public Impact

Enhances troop protection in combat zones. Supports military operations and readiness. Drives innovation in armored vehicle manufacturing. Contributes to the defense industrial base.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically military vehicle manufacturing. Spending benchmarks for similar armored vehicle procurements would be necessary for a detailed comparison, but the amount is substantial.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. The prime contractor, BAE Systems, is a large corporation, suggesting limited direct opportunities for small businesses in this specific prime contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for large procurement contracts. The firm fixed price structure provides some cost control.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

military-armored-vehicle-tank-and-tank-c, department-of-defense, pa, do, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $627.8 million to BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P.. CATEGORY II MRAP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BAE SYSTEMS LAND & ARMAMENTS L.P..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $627.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-12-18. End: 2012-04-30.

What was the average per-unit cost for the MRAP vehicles procured under this contract, and how does it compare to industry benchmarks for similar vehicles?

The total award was $627,833,615.70 for 10 units, resulting in an average per-unit cost of approximately $62.8 million. This figure is exceptionally high and likely represents a misunderstanding of the data or a highly specialized variant. Typical MRAP unit costs were significantly lower, often in the $300k-$700k range, depending on the specific model and configuration.

What were the key performance requirements and technical specifications that justified the significant investment in these MRAP vehicles?

The Category II MRAP designation implies a focus on survivability against specific threats, likely roadside bombs and ambushes, in high-risk environments. Key performance requirements would have included advanced armor, blast-resistant seating, and enhanced mobility for off-road terrain. The substantial cost suggests highly specialized protection features and potentially advanced integrated systems.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value and technical solution for the Department of Defense's needs?

While full and open competition is generally the best method for ensuring value, the extremely high per-unit cost raises questions about whether the competitive process fully optimized price discovery for this specific procurement. It's possible that unique technical requirements or limited qualified bidders for this advanced variant influenced the final pricing despite the competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Transportation Equipment ManufacturingMilitary Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: BAE Systems PLC (UEI: 217304393)

Address: 2890 DE LA CRUZ BLVD, SANTA CLARA, CA, 17

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $627,833,616

Exercised Options: $627,833,616

Current Obligation: $627,833,616

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785407D5025

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-12-18

Current End Date: 2012-04-30

Potential End Date: 2012-04-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-04-18

More Contracts from BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P.

View all BAE Systems Land & Armaments L.P. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending