DoD's $81.9M R&D Contract with Salient Federal Solutions Faces Scrutiny Over Competition and Value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $81,885,844 ($81.9M)

Contractor: Salient Federal Solutions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-02-01

End Date: 2015-05-07

Contract Duration: 1,191 days

Daily Burn Rate: $68.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: LABOR - BASE PERIOD

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BELVOIR, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22060

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $81.9 million to SALIENT FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: LABOR - BASE PERIOD Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Salient Federal Solutions, Inc. for R&D services is for a significant amount, raising questions about its overall value. 2. The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' suggesting potential limitations in the competitive landscape. 3. The 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences' sector is critical but often complex to benchmark. 4. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly, posing a risk to taxpayer funds.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure requires careful monitoring to ensure costs remain reasonable and aligned with project milestones. Benchmarking CPFF contracts in R&D is challenging due to the inherent uncertainty in research outcomes.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' indicates that while competition was sought, it was not entirely unrestricted. This method can impact price discovery by limiting the pool of potential bidders, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition and CPFF structure could result in less favorable pricing for taxpayers compared to a fully open and competitively bid contract.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying more than necessary due to the limited competition and cost-plus pricing model. The effectiveness of the R&D services provided needs to be rigorously assessed to ensure the investment yields desired outcomes. Lack of transparency in the bidding process could erode public trust in government contracting.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. Spending in this area is crucial for innovation but requires careful oversight due to its complexity and potential for cost escalation. Benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the unique nature of R&D projects.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this contract should focus on rigorous monitoring of costs, adherence to project milestones, and the quality of R&D outcomes. The contracting agency must ensure accountability for the fixed fee and any allowable costs incurred.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $81.9 million to SALIENT FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, INC.. LABOR - BASE PERIOD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SALIENT FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $81.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-02-01. End: 2015-05-07.

What specific R&D advancements or deliverables were achieved under this contract, and how do they align with the initial objectives and taxpayer investment?

The contract's success hinges on tangible R&D advancements. A thorough review of project reports, technical evaluations, and final deliverables is necessary to ascertain if the $81.9 million investment yielded significant scientific or technological progress. This assessment should compare outcomes against the initial scope of work and stated objectives to determine if the value proposition for taxpayers was met.

How did the 'exclusion of sources' in the competition process impact the final contract price and the range of innovative solutions considered?

The exclusion of certain sources, even within a broader competitive framework, can limit the diversity of approaches and potentially inflate prices. An analysis should compare the awarded price to similar R&D contracts that underwent full and open competition to identify any premium paid. Understanding the rationale for exclusion is key to assessing if it was justified and did not unduly restrict innovation or cost-effectiveness.

What mechanisms were in place to control costs and ensure efficiency within the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, and were they effectively utilized?

CPFF contracts require robust oversight to prevent cost overruns. This includes detailed audits of expenditures, clear definitions of allowable costs, and performance metrics tied to the fixed fee. Evaluating the agency's cost control measures and their effectiveness in preventing unnecessary spending is crucial for determining the overall financial prudence of this contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4000 LEGATO ROAD STE 600, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $81,885,844

Exercised Options: $81,885,844

Current Obligation: $81,885,844

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC102808D2002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-02-01

Current End Date: 2015-05-07

Potential End Date: 2015-08-07 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-03-05

More Contracts from Salient Federal Solutions, Inc.

View all Salient Federal Solutions, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending