Walsh Construction Company awarded $32M for administrative facility design/build in Virginia
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,028,476 ($32.0M)
Contractor: Walsh Construction Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-27
End Date: 2009-03-25
Contract Duration: 910 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: P-236V - DESIGN/BUILD ADMINISTRATIVE
Place of Performance
Location: NORFOLK, NORFOLK CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23511
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $32.0 million to WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for work described as: P-236V - DESIGN/BUILD ADMINISTRATIVE Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a design/build project of this scope. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Project duration of 910 days indicates a significant undertaking. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor. 5. The contract falls within the broader category of facilities construction and maintenance. 6. No specific performance metrics or outcomes are detailed in the provided data.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $32,028,476 for a design/build administrative facility in Virginia seems within a reasonable range for a project of this scale and duration (910 days). Without specific details on the facility's size, complexity, or location within Virginia, a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor, Walsh Construction Company, has priced the project to cover all costs and profit, implying a benchmarked value assessment during the bidding phase.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data shows 10 bids were received, suggesting a healthy level of competition for this project. A competitive bidding process generally leads to better price discovery and can result in more favorable pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely drove down the final award price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and its personnel who will utilize the new administrative facility. The project delivers design and construction services for a critical administrative building. The geographic impact is localized to Virginia, where the facility will be constructed. The contract supports jobs in the construction and design sectors, potentially including skilled trades and project management roles.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise, despite the fixed-price nature.
- Risk of schedule delays impacting the operational readiness of the administrative function.
- Quality control during construction needs rigorous oversight to ensure durability and functionality.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition suggests a strong market response and potentially competitive pricing.
- Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- The contractor, Walsh Construction Company, has a track record in large-scale construction projects.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader construction and facilities management sector, specifically focusing on government administrative buildings. The market for design-build services for federal agencies is substantial, with numerous firms capable of undertaking such projects. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other design-build contracts for similar-sized administrative facilities awarded by various federal agencies, considering regional construction cost variations.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not detailed, but it implies that larger, established firms were the primary bidders and likely recipients of the prime contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and facilities management divisions. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified design and construction within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though specific project oversight details are not provided here. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Building Construction
- Military Construction Projects
- Department of Defense Facilities
- Design-Build Contracts
- Naval Facilities Engineering Command Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep if design requirements evolve significantly post-award.
- Contractor performance risk related to schedule adherence and quality of construction.
- Site condition risks inherent in any construction project.
Tags
construction, design-build, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, virginia, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, administrative-facility, large-contract, federal-government
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $32.0 million to WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. P-236V - DESIGN/BUILD ADMINISTRATIVE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-27. End: 2009-03-25.
What is the specific nature and scope of the administrative facility being designed and built?
The provided data identifies the project as 'P-236V - DESIGN/BUILD ADMINISTRATIVE' but lacks specific details on the facility's purpose, size (square footage), number of floors, or intended occupants. It is an administrative facility, suggesting it will house offices, support staff, and related functions for the Department of the Navy. The 'design/build' aspect means the contractor is responsible for both the architectural/engineering design and the physical construction of the building. Further details would typically be found in the contract's statement of work or performance work statement.
How does the awarded amount of $32,028,476 compare to industry benchmarks for similar design-build administrative facilities?
Benchmarking this $32 million contract requires more specific project details, such as the facility's square footage, complexity, and specific location within Virginia, as construction costs vary significantly by region and project type. However, for a large administrative facility requiring both design and construction over a 910-day period, this figure appears to be within a plausible range. Industry benchmarks often look at cost per square foot. For example, typical government administrative building costs can range from $300 to $600+ per square foot depending on finishes, systems, and location. If this facility is, say, 100,000 sq ft, the cost per square foot would be around $320, which is on the lower end but potentially achievable in some markets or for less complex designs.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or quality assurance measures associated with this contract?
The provided data does not explicitly list Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or specific quality assurance measures for this contract. However, as a firm fixed-price contract awarded under full and open competition, the primary performance expectation is the successful completion of the design and construction according to the contract's specifications and schedule. Quality assurance would typically involve government inspections during construction, review of design submittals, and final acceptance testing. The Department of the Navy would have internal quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs) to monitor contractor performance and ensure compliance with contract requirements.
What is Walsh Construction Company's track record with similar federal design-build projects?
Walsh Construction Company is a large, established general contractor with a significant history of undertaking complex construction projects, including those for federal agencies. While specific details on their past design-build administrative facilities for the Department of the Navy are not in this dataset, their general portfolio often includes large-scale infrastructure, healthcare, and institutional buildings. A deeper dive into their contract history, client feedback, and past performance evaluations (available through sources like the Federal Procurement Data System - FPDS) would provide a more precise assessment of their relevant track record and suitability for this specific project.
What is the historical spending trend for similar administrative facility construction by the Department of the Navy in Virginia?
Analyzing historical spending trends for similar projects by the Department of the Navy in Virginia would require accessing and processing extensive federal procurement data over several fiscal years. This contract, awarded in 2006 for work completed by 2009, represents a specific investment. To understand trends, one would need to aggregate data on all design-build and construction contracts for administrative facilities awarded by the Navy in Virginia within a defined period (e.g., the last 5-10 years), noting award amounts, contract types, and project scopes. This would reveal patterns in spending levels, types of contractors utilized, and average project costs, providing context for the $32 million award.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Walsh Group Ltd., the (UEI: 121476675)
Address: 929 WEST ADAMS ST, CHICAGO, IL, 60607
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $32,028,476
Exercised Options: $32,028,476
Current Obligation: $32,028,476
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6247001D1138
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-27
Current End Date: 2009-03-25
Potential End Date: 2009-03-25 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-04
More Contracts from Walsh Construction Company
- Construct Mental Health Inpatient Bldg 1 — $161.8M (Department of Defense)
- Recoveryproject#::5014::rp# Construction of the Noaa PRC AT Ford Island, Pearl Harbor, HI. the Work to BE Performed Provides for and Involves Adaptive Reuse of Historic Hangars and NEW Construction on an Historic Landmark Site. the Diverse Program Includes Marine Biology Laboratories, National Data Cneter, Dive Center, International Tsunami Information Center, Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, National Weather Service and Administrative Functions. Project Includes Site Work, Hazardous Material Abatement Work and Incidental Related Work — $158.2M (Department of Defense)
- Replace Family Housing Wafb — $137.4M (Department of Defense)
- THE NEW Outpatient Clinic Will Replace the Existing Chalmers P. Wylie VA Outpatient Clinic. the NEW OPC IS to BE a NEW 295,000 SQ. FT. Outpatient Clinic Located on 20 Acres of the Defense Supply Center in Columbus, Ohio. the NEW Clinic Will Include Services for Human Resources, Nursing Administration, Radiology, Engineering, Outpatient Pharmacy, Outpatient Surgery, Pharmacy, EEG, Pathology and Laboratory, Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation, Prosthetics and Medical Administration Services. the Project Will Also Include Surface Parking, Necessary Utilities, Site Work and Landscaping — $89.9M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- General Construction of a NEW BED Tower Building for the VA Westside Medical Center and the Renovation of Building 1 — $86.4M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)