Naval Air Warfare Center Training contract awarded to NLX Corporation for $32.78M for operational training devices
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,783,173 ($32.8M)
Contractor: Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-09-23
End Date: 2011-08-26
Contract Duration: 2,894 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200312!000267!1700!A8302 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133901D0722 !A!N! !N!0005 !20030923!20030630!809238447!809238447!809238447!N!NLX CORPORATION !22626 SALLY RIDE DRIVE !STERLING !VA!20164!06607!007!36!BINGHAMTON !BROOME !NEW YORK !+000013277678!N!N!000000000000!6930!OPERATIONAL TRAINING DEVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541990!A!A!5!B!M! !A!D!20040630!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!001!A! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !A! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: CEDAR RAPIDS, LINN County, IOWA, 52498
State: Iowa Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $32.8 million to ROCKWELL COLLINS SIMULATION & TRAINING SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: 200312!000267!1700!A8302 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133901D0722 !A!N! !N!0005 !20030923!20030630!809238447!809238447!809238447!N!NLX CORPORATION !22626 SALLY RIDE DRIVE !STERLING !VA!20164!06607!007!36!BINGHAMTON !BROOM… Key points: 1. Contract value of $32.78M over its period of performance. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of approximately 8 years. 4. Primarily for operational training devices. 5. NAICS code 541990 indicates a broad range of professional, scientific, and technical services. 6. Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs for the government.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $32.78M over nearly 8 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific details on the number or type of training devices, a direct value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price nature provides cost certainty. Benchmarking against similar contracts for operational training devices would be necessary for a more precise evaluation of pricing and value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The government likely received proposals from various qualified contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best possible pricing through a competitive bidding process.
Public Impact
Naval personnel will benefit from enhanced operational training capabilities. Services delivered include the provision of operational training devices. Geographic impact is likely concentrated around naval training facilities. Workforce implications may include roles in the development, manufacturing, and maintenance of training devices.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the training devices procured makes it difficult to assess technological relevance and potential obsolescence.
- The long contract duration could lead to potential cost overruns if not managed effectively, despite the FFP structure.
- Limited information on performance metrics makes it hard to gauge the effectiveness of the training devices.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Long contract duration may indicate a significant and ongoing need for these training capabilities.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically related to defense training and simulation. The market for operational training devices is significant within the defense industry, encompassing a range of technologies from basic simulators to complex virtual reality systems. Spending in this area is driven by the need for realistic and cost-effective training solutions for military personnel.
Small Business Impact
Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans is not explicitly detailed in the provided data. As this was a full and open competition, the primary award went to NLX Corporation. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved in the subcontracting chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for the contractor to deliver within the agreed-upon price. Transparency would depend on the public availability of contract performance reports and any associated Inspector General reviews.
Related Government Programs
- Naval Training Systems
- Defense Simulation and Training
- Operational Readiness Programs
- Military Equipment Procurement
Risk Flags
- Potential for technological obsolescence given the contract duration.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics hinders effectiveness assessment.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, naval-air-warfare-center-training, firm-fixed-price, operational-training-devices, full-and-open-competition, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, naics-541990, nlx-corporation, va, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $32.8 million to ROCKWELL COLLINS SIMULATION & TRAINING SOLUTIONS LLC. 200312!000267!1700!A8302 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133901D0722 !A!N! !N!0005 !20030923!20030630!809238447!809238447!809238447!N!NLX CORPORATION !22626 SALLY RIDE DRIVE !STERLING !VA!20164!06607!007!36!BINGHAMTON !BROOME !NEW YORK !+000013277678!N!N!000000000000!6930!OPERATIONAL TRAINING DEVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541990!A!A!5!B!M! !A!D!20040630!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ROCKWELL COLLINS SIMULATION & TRAINING SOLUTIONS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-09-23. End: 2011-08-26.
What specific types of operational training devices were procured under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'OPERATIONAL TRAINING DEVICES' under NAICS code 541990 (All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services). However, the specific types of devices are not detailed. This could range from flight simulators and virtual reality training systems to maintenance trainers or tactical scenario simulators. Understanding the exact nature of these devices is crucial for assessing their technological relevance, cost, and impact on training effectiveness.
How does the contract value of $32.78M compare to similar procurements for operational training devices?
A direct comparison of the $32.78M contract value is challenging without knowing the specifics of the devices procured and the contract duration. However, the contract spanned from September 2003 to August 2011 (approximately 8 years), making the average annual value around $4.1M. This figure needs to be benchmarked against the cost of comparable training systems, considering factors like complexity, technology, and the number of units acquired. Without more granular data on the scope of work and market rates for similar systems, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a competitive price point.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the contractor's performance?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate NLX Corporation's performance under this contract. Typically, for training device contracts, KPIs might include factors such as device reliability (uptime), fidelity of simulation, adherence to delivery schedules, training effectiveness as measured by user feedback or performance improvements, and compliance with technical specifications. The absence of this information limits a thorough assessment of the contractor's track record and the overall success of the delivered training solutions.
What is the historical spending trend for operational training devices by the Naval Air Warfare Center?
The provided data represents a single contract award from 2003 to 2011. To understand historical spending trends for operational training devices by the Naval Air Warfare Center, a broader analysis of multiple contracts over a longer period would be necessary. This would involve examining annual spending patterns, identifying major contract vehicles, and tracking the evolution of technology and associated costs. This single data point does not provide sufficient context to establish a trend.
Were there any identified risks associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated?
The provided data does not explicitly list any identified risks or mitigation strategies for this contract. However, common risks in procuring complex training devices can include technological obsolescence, integration challenges with existing systems, schedule delays, cost overruns (though mitigated by FFP), and contractor performance issues. The firm fixed-price structure inherently shifts some cost risk to the contractor. Further details on risk management would likely be found in the contract's statement of work or associated documentation.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Rockwell Collins, Inc. (UEI: 962960589)
Address: 22626 SALLY RIDE DRIVE, STERLING, VA, 10
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6133901D0722
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-09-23
Current End Date: 2011-08-26
Potential End Date: 2011-08-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-08-27
More Contracts from Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions LLC
- Hits-Iv Contract to Procure 1 WST to Retrofit, Tech Refresh, and Update Software (cyber/Dssc-4) on Hits Suite of Trainers to Obtain Tech Data to Procure Maintenance, User, Cyber Security/Sw Training, and ICS — $323.3M (Department of Defense)
- E2D Hits-Iii TT Device 15F14 S/N 4 — $315.3M (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Integrated Training System for Aircrew — $179.0M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $113.6M (Department of Defense)
- 199909!5700!0053!GU86 !asc/Ywk !F3365798D0008 !A!*!0002 !19990604!20031030!809238447!809238447!809238447!n!00wx8!intelx Corporation !741 Miller DR SE F !leesburg !va!20175!44984!107!51!leesburg !loudoun !virginia !0001!+000006306906!n!n!000000000000!6930!operational Training Devices !a1c!other Aircraft Equipment !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !3728!5!a!s!*!b!b!*!a !N!J!2!003!F!* !Z!N!Z!* !* !n!b!*!z!*!c!a!a!*!* !*!n!a!b!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $98.5M (Department of Defense)
View all Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)