Army Awards $41.9M for Engineering Services to Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $41,950,742 ($42.0M)
Contractor: Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-06-20
End Date: 2017-09-30
Contract Duration: 5,216 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: 200309!001215!2100!AA09 !U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !DAAA0902D0003 !A!N! !N!0005 !20030620!20040331!113633189!113633189!112358432!N!TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, IN!300 SPARKMAN DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000003492118!N!N!000000000000!AD21!RDTE/SERVICES-BASIC RESEARCH !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!V!2!004!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35801
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $42.0 million to TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC. for work described as: 200309!001215!2100!AA09 !U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !DAAA0902D0003 !A!N! !N!0005 !20030620!20040331!113633189!113633189!112358432!N!TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, IN!300 SPARKMAN DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADIS… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering services to support Army industrial operations. 2. Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc. is the sole awardee. 3. The contract has a duration of over 14 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The sector is Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDTE).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value is $41.9 million over a significant period. Without specific performance metrics or comparable contracts for similar long-term basic research services, a precise value assessment is difficult. The Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure suggests an attempt to control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the long duration and specific nature of the services may limit the number of truly competitive bids.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to secure fair pricing for taxpayers, but the long-term nature and potential for cost overruns in CPIF contracts warrant monitoring.
Public Impact
Supports critical Army industrial operations through specialized engineering services. Long-term contract suggests sustained demand for these services. Potential for technological advancements stemming from basic research.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 80 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 14 years) can lead to cost creep.
- CPIF contracts can sometimes result in higher final costs if not managed closely.
- Lack of detailed performance data makes value assessment challenging.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Supports essential defense research and development.
- Incentive fee structure aims for cost efficiency.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting RDTE for the Department of the Army. Benchmarks for long-term basic research contracts are difficult to establish due to their specialized nature and varying scope.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to a large corporation, Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc. There is no indication of small business subcontracting in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
The long duration of the contract necessitates robust oversight from the Department of the Army to ensure performance, manage costs, and verify that the services continue to meet evolving requirements.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation.
- CPIF contract type requires careful monitoring to control costs.
- Limited information on specific services and performance metrics.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to specialized nature of services.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, al, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $42.0 million to TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC.. 200309!001215!2100!AA09 !U.S. ARMY INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS !DAAA0902D0003 !A!N! !N!0005 !20030620!20040331!113633189!113633189!112358432!N!TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, IN!300 SPARKMAN DRIVE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35805!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000003492118!N!N!000000000000!AD21!RDTE/SERVICES-BASIC RESEARCH !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $42.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-06-20. End: 2017-09-30.
What specific engineering services are being provided under this contract, and how do they directly contribute to Army industrial operations?
The contract specifies 'Engineering Services' (NAICS 541330) and is categorized under RDTE/Services-Basic Research. While the exact nature of the services is not detailed, they likely involve complex technical analysis, design, testing, and support for advanced industrial processes or systems critical to the Army's operational capabilities. The 'basic research' designation suggests foundational work that may not have immediate applications but is crucial for future technological development.
Given the Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure and the long contract duration, what are the primary risks to taxpayers regarding cost overruns?
The primary risks to taxpayers include potential cost overruns due to the CPIF structure, where the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fee that varies based on performance against targets. A long duration (over 14 years) amplifies this risk, as unforeseen technical challenges or scope creep can significantly increase costs. Without stringent oversight and clear performance metrics, the incentive fee may not adequately control expenses, leading to a higher final cost than initially projected.
How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach for securing specialized, long-term basic research services like those provided by Teledyne Brown Engineering?
Full and open competition is generally effective for standard services, promoting a wide range of bidders and competitive pricing. However, for highly specialized, long-term basic research, the pool of qualified contractors may be limited. While competition ensures a baseline of fairness, the unique expertise required might mean only a few firms can realistically compete, potentially reducing the price discovery benefits. The long duration also means the initial competition must accurately forecast future needs and costs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (UEI: 112358432)
Address: 300 SPARKMAN DR NW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35805
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DAAA0902D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-06-20
Current End Date: 2017-09-30
Potential End Date: 2017-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-08-13
More Contracts from Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc.
- Systems Development&operations Support a Primary Mission of the Marshall Space Flight Center (msfc) IS to Support Nasa's Human Exploration and Development of Space (heds) Enterprise and the Office of Biological and Physical Research (obpr) Enterprise WHO ARE Working Together to Facilitate Long-Term Exploration of Space. Msfc Serves AS Nasa's Lead Center for the Materials Science and Biotechnology Disciplines and Serves Other Customers and Sponsors Within the Agency. the Purposes of This Contract ARE to Further the Science Goals of the Agency by 1) Developing, Operating and Maintaining Facilities and Payloads on the International Space Station (ISS) and Other Vehicles and Carriers, 2) Providing Science, Technical and Engineering Support to Investigators, and 3) Providing Management and Administrative Support to Msad. the Contractor Shall Provide the Necessary Management, Personnel, and Equipment/Supplies (NOT Otherwise Provided by the Government) Required to Perform the Engineering, Science and Technical Tasks Broadly Defined in This Statement of Work (SOW) and More Specifically Described in the Task/Delivery Order (order) and Technical Directives Issued by the Government. the Contractor Shall Provide the Planning, Coordination, Technical Direction, and Surveillance of the Activities Necessary to Assure Disciplined Performance of Work and Timely Application of Resources for the Accomplishment of ALL Orders Issued Under the Contract Approved by Msad. the Contractor Shall Establish, Implement, and Maintain a Financial Reporting System in Accordance With the Nasa FAR Supplement (NFS) 1852.242-73 and Nasa Procedures and Guidelines (NPG) 9501.2D. the Contractor Shall Provide the Overall Management Effort Required to Integrate Technical and Programmatic Functions Necessary for Achievement of the Objectives of the Contract. the Contractor Shall Develop, Submit, and Maintain Detailed Master Schedules Based on a Logic Driven Network That Supports Applicable Msad Project and ISS Program Managed Milestones. the Contractor Shall BE Responsible for Procurement Functions: the Contractor Shall Create, Maintain and Submit in the Format Specified by Msad, Miscellaneous Graphics, Presentations and Reports Supporting the Payloads and the Research Program, and the Major Msad Program Activities and Milestones. the Contractor Shall Define, Design, Develop, Fabricate, Assemble, Test, Deliver, Integrate and Operate Microgravity Science Payloads and Facilities. the Contractor Shall Define the Resources, Structure, Approach, and Processes Required to Complete the Final Design, Development, Fabrication, Assembly, Test, Integration, Operation, Maintenance, Support, and Retirement of the Required Hardware, Software, and Associated Infrastructure. the Contractor Shall Support or Conduct Technical Reviews Appropriate for Individual Payload Development and to Meet the Requirements of the Order — $397.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Mission Operations and Integration (MO&I) Contract. This Contract Involves Operations Support for ALL Phases of Flight Including Mission Preparation, Crew and Flight Controller Training, and Real-Time Operations Requirements for Spaceflight Operations Support. the Core Services Portion of the Contract Establishes Requirements for Payload Operations in Support of the International Space Station (ISS) Program, While Task Orders Issued Under the Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (idiq) Component Will Provide the Capability to ADD Operations Support for Other Program or Project Requirements — $371.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Marshall Operations Systems, Services, and Integration II (mossi II) — $253.6M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Production of FMS Boats U1, U2, and U3 — $237.7M (Department of Defense)
- Launch Vehicle/Stages Adapter — $205.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)