DoD's $25.8M Mark Center Operations Contract Awarded to Digital Management LLC for 3 Years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,794,009 ($25.8M)

Contractor: Digital Management LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-08-16

End Date: 2016-08-15

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: MARK CENTER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22301

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.8 million to DIGITAL MANAGEMENT LLC for work described as: MARK CENTER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in IT infrastructure management. 2. Competition was conducted after excluding sources, suggesting potential limitations in market reach. 3. The contract's duration of three years allows for sustained service delivery. 4. Performance risk appears moderate given the nature of IT operations and maintenance. 5. This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on facilities management. 6. The award to a single contractor indicates a specific need or capability alignment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of approximately $25.8 million over three years averages to about $8.6 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar IT operations and maintenance contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure can sometimes lead to higher costs if not carefully managed, as it incentivizes spending to cover costs plus a fixed profit. Further analysis would require comparing the specific services rendered and the fixed fee percentage against industry standards for similar government IT support contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This indicates that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded from the outset. The number of bidders is not specified, but the exclusion suggests a potentially narrower field than a truly open competition. This approach might be used when specific technical capabilities or prior performance are critical, but it can limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to a broader competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources may mean taxpayers did not benefit from the widest possible range of competitive bids, potentially resulting in a higher overall cost for the services provided.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from the continuity of IT operations and maintenance. Essential IT services are maintained, ensuring the functionality of critical military systems. The contract supports IT infrastructure within Virginia, impacting the local federal IT ecosystem. Workforce implications include employment for IT professionals involved in operations and maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically focusing on IT facilities management and operations. The market for IT services, particularly those supporting government agencies, is substantial and highly competitive. Contracts like this are crucial for maintaining the operational readiness of federal IT infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale IT O&M contracts awarded by defense agencies, considering factors like service scope, duration, and pricing models.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Digital Management LLC, is likely a large business, and any subcontracting opportunities would be at their discretion or driven by broader federal subcontracting goals not specified here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army and the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are inherent in the CPFF contract type, requiring detailed cost reporting and justification. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract's execution.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, operations-and-maintenance, it-facilities-management, cost-plus-fixed-fee, limited-competition, virginia, digital-management-llc, it-infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.8 million to DIGITAL MANAGEMENT LLC. MARK CENTER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DIGITAL MANAGEMENT LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-08-16. End: 2016-08-15.

What is the track record of Digital Management LLC in performing similar IT operations and maintenance contracts for the federal government?

Digital Management LLC (DMI) has a history of performing IT services for various federal agencies. While specific details on past IT operations and maintenance contracts require deeper database analysis, DMI's portfolio often includes IT support, cybersecurity, and cloud services. Their performance on previous contracts, including any past performance evaluations or awards, would be crucial in assessing their capability to successfully execute this specific DoD Mark Center Operations and Maintenance contract. A review of their contract history would reveal the scale, complexity, and success rates of their prior engagements, providing context for their suitability and the potential risks associated with this award.

How does the average annual cost of this contract compare to similar IT facilities management contracts within the Department of Defense?

The average annual cost of this contract is approximately $8.6 million ($25.8M / 3 years). To benchmark this effectively, one would need to compare it against other Department of Defense (DoD) contracts for IT facilities management and operations and maintenance (O&M) services of similar scope and duration. Factors such as the number of facilities managed, the criticality of the systems supported, the geographic spread, and the specific services included (e.g., hardware maintenance, network support, data center operations) are vital for a fair comparison. Without access to detailed service level agreements and pricing structures of comparable contracts, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, if similar contracts for comparable services are significantly lower, it could indicate potential overpricing or less efficient service delivery under this award.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for IT operations and maintenance?

The primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for IT operations and maintenance revolve around cost control and contractor incentive. In a CPFF structure, the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. The risk for the government is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs rigorously, as their profit is fixed regardless of the total cost incurred. This can lead to cost overruns if not managed with stringent oversight and clear performance metrics. For IT O&M, where unforeseen technical issues or upgrades can arise, the potential for cost escalation is present. Effective risk mitigation requires robust government oversight, detailed cost tracking, and well-defined performance standards to ensure value for money.

What does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' procurement method imply for the effectiveness of competition and potential cost savings?

The procurement method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' implies a nuanced approach to competition. While it aims for broad participation, the explicit exclusion of certain sources suggests that only a subset of potential offerors was considered eligible. This exclusion might be based on specific technical requirements, past performance, or other criteria deemed necessary by the agency. The effectiveness of competition is therefore limited compared to a truly open solicitation where all responsible sources could bid. This limitation can impact price discovery, potentially leading to higher prices than might be achieved in a wider competitive environment. The rationale for exclusion needs to be well-justified to ensure that the government is still obtaining the best possible value and that taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

How has federal spending on IT operations and maintenance services evolved over the past five years, and where does this contract fit within that trend?

Federal spending on IT operations and maintenance (O&M) services has generally remained a significant portion of overall IT budgets, often comprising a substantial percentage dedicated to sustaining existing infrastructure and systems. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on agency priorities and technological shifts, there's a consistent demand for services ensuring the reliability and security of government IT. This $25.8 million contract for DoD IT O&M fits within this ongoing trend of substantial federal investment in maintaining critical IT capabilities. It reflects the government's commitment to ensuring the operational readiness of its digital infrastructure, particularly within defense agencies where system uptime and security are paramount. Trends may show shifts towards cloud-based O&M or increased focus on cybersecurity within O&M, but core infrastructure support remains a constant expenditure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Facilities Management Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: HQ003410R0046

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6701 DEMOCRACY BLVD STE 500, BETHESDA, MD, 20817

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,982,143

Exercised Options: $25,794,009

Current Obligation: $25,794,009

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HQ003411D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2013-08-16

Current End Date: 2016-08-15

Potential End Date: 2016-08-15 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-03-20

More Contracts from Digital Management LLC

View all Digital Management LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending