DoD's $23.8M Remediation Services Contract Awarded to Amentum Environment & Energy Inc. in 2005

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,784,667 ($23.8M)

Contractor: Amentum Environment & Energy Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-08-03

End Date: 2008-05-29

Contract Duration: 1,030 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 30

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $23.8 million to AMENTUM ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded for remediation services, indicating a focus on environmental cleanup. 2. The contract duration of 1030 days suggests a significant, multi-year project. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, implying a robust bidding process. 4. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize cost control but requires careful oversight. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 562910 points to hazardous waste treatment and disposal. 6. The awarding agency is the Department of the Air Force, a major component of the DoD. 7. The base award value of $23.1M suggests a substantial investment in environmental services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this 2005 contract is challenging due to the age of the data and the specific nature of remediation services. However, the base award of approximately $23.1 million for a project spanning over 1000 days indicates a significant investment. Without comparable contract data for similar environmental remediation projects of that era, it's difficult to definitively assess if the pricing was competitive or represented excellent value for money. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates close monitoring to ensure costs remain reasonable and the fixed fee is justified.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple companies were invited to bid. This process is designed to foster a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service offerings. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies a broad solicitation. The level of competition is a positive indicator for price discovery and ensuring the government receives a fair deal.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs and encouraging innovation among contractors, leading to more efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military installations requiring environmental cleanup and remediation services. Services delivered include the treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, contributing to environmental protection. The geographic impact is likely concentrated at Air Force bases or other DoD facilities where remediation is needed. The contract supports a workforce skilled in environmental engineering, hazardous material handling, and project management.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The environmental remediation services sector is a critical component of government contracting, particularly for agencies managing large physical footprints like the Department of Defense. This contract falls under the broader environmental consulting and remediation industry, which includes services like hazardous waste management, site cleanup, and compliance monitoring. The market for these services is driven by regulatory requirements and the need to address legacy environmental issues. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve looking at other large-scale environmental cleanup contracts awarded by federal agencies for similar types of contamination or site restoration.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, it did not directly involve small business set-aside provisions. The implications for small businesses would primarily be through potential subcontracting opportunities, which are not detailed in this award data. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals, it's difficult to assess the broader impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract would typically involve the contracting officer and their representatives (CORs) to monitor costs, performance, and compliance with contract terms. Accountability measures would be tied to meeting project milestones and environmental standards. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed performance reports and cost breakdowns may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, remediation-services, environmental-services, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, hazardous-waste, large-contract, past-performance-needed, 2005-award

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $23.8 million to AMENTUM ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-08-03. End: 2008-05-29.

What was the specific nature of the remediation services required under this contract?

The contract, identified by NAICS code 562910, pertains to Remediation Services. This typically involves the cleanup of contaminated sites, treatment of hazardous waste, and restoration of environmental conditions. Given the awarding agency is the Department of the Air Force, the services likely addressed environmental contamination at one or more Air Force installations, potentially stemming from historical operations involving fuels, solvents, or other hazardous materials. Specific details regarding the types of contaminants, the extent of the contamination, and the precise remediation techniques employed would be found in the contract's statement of work (SOW), which is not provided in the summary data.

How does the $23.8 million award compare to typical spending on similar remediation contracts?

Comparing the $23.8 million award to typical spending on similar remediation contracts is challenging without more specific context and a defined timeframe. Environmental remediation projects can vary significantly in scope, complexity, and duration, leading to wide-ranging costs. Contracts for large-scale site cleanups, especially those involving complex contaminants or extensive land areas, can easily reach tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars. This $23.8 million award, for a project lasting over 1000 days, appears substantial but within the plausible range for significant federal environmental cleanup efforts. A more precise comparison would require analyzing contracts with similar NAICS codes, project durations, and contaminant types awarded around the same period.

What are the potential risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for remediation services?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts carry inherent risks, particularly for complex projects like environmental remediation. The primary risk for the government is that the contractor may have less incentive to control costs rigorously compared to fixed-price contracts, as the government agrees to cover all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. This can lead to cost overruns if the initial cost estimates are inaccurate or if unforeseen issues arise during the remediation process. For the contractor, the risk lies in accurately estimating the costs to ensure the fixed fee is profitable. Effective oversight by the government is crucial to scrutinize costs, ensure efficiency, and prevent unnecessary expenditures to mitigate these risks.

What was Amentum Environment & Energy Inc.'s track record at the time of this award?

Information regarding Amentum Environment & Energy Inc.'s specific track record at the time of this 2005 award is not detailed in the provided summary data. However, Amentum (and its predecessor companies) has historically been a significant player in the government contracting space, particularly in areas related to environmental services, energy, and infrastructure support. To assess their track record comprehensively for this period, one would need to examine past performance evaluations, previous contract awards, and any reported issues or successes on similar projects undertaken by the company prior to August 2005. This would provide insight into their capability to perform complex remediation tasks effectively and manage project costs.

How has federal spending on remediation services evolved since this contract was awarded?

Federal spending on remediation services has likely evolved significantly since this contract was awarded in 2005. Factors influencing this evolution include changes in environmental regulations, increased awareness of environmental protection, technological advancements in cleanup methods, and shifting priorities within agencies like the Department of Defense. Spending may have increased due to more stringent cleanup standards or the identification of new contaminated sites. Conversely, efficiencies gained through technology or better project management could potentially moderate cost increases. Analyzing historical federal procurement data for NAICS code 562910 and related environmental services over the past two decades would reveal trends in overall spending, average contract values, and the types of services most frequently procured.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesRemediation Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICESARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 30

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 106 NEWBERRY ST SW, AIKEN, SC, 02

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA890304D8680

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-08-03

Current End Date: 2008-05-29

Potential End Date: 2008-05-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-09-05

More Contracts from Amentum Environment & Energy Inc.

View all Amentum Environment & Energy Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending