DoD's $31.3M Environmental Services Contract Awarded to Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,330,480 ($31.3M)

Contractor: Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 1997-06-30

End Date: 2008-11-30

Contract Duration: 4,171 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 199709!2100!0551!CA21 !USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, !DACA2196D0018 !A!*!0004 !19970630!20011130!048985691!028655181!106521081!N!8X202!I T CORPORATION !312 DIRECTORS DR !KNOXVILLE !TN!37923!63912!089!01!REDSTONE ARSENAL !MADISON !ALABAMA !0001!+000003363318!N!N!000000000000!F999!OTHER ENVIRON SVCS, STUDIES, & ANALYTICAL SUPPORT !S1 !SERVICES !1ZDE!DEF ENVIR & RESTORA PRG (DERP)!8744!5!B!S!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!002!B!* !C!Y!Z!* !* !N!C!*!Z!Z!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35809

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $31.3 million to SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. for work described as: 199709!2100!0551!CA21 !USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, !DACA2196D0018 !A!*!0004 !19970630!20011130!048985691!028655181!106521081!N!8X202!I T CORPORATION !312 DIRECTORS DR !KNOXVILLE !TN!37923!63912!089!01!REDSTONE ARSENAL !MADISO… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $31,330,480.25, was awarded to Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. 2. Awarded by the Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, for environmental services. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. The period of performance spans from June 30, 1997, to November 30, 2008, with a duration of 4171 days. 5. This contract falls under the 'Other' sector, likely related to environmental remediation and support services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $31.3M for environmental services over a 10-year period appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental remediation contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple vendors are encouraged to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring the government receives the best value through a competitive bidding environment.

Public Impact

Environmental cleanup and restoration efforts at Redstone Arsenal will be managed under this contract. Long-term environmental stewardship and compliance for military installations are supported by this award. Potential for job creation in environmental services and related fields within Alabama. Ensures continued operation of critical environmental programs for the Department of Defense.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under 'Other' services, specifically environmental services, studies, and analytical support. Spending in this sector is crucial for regulatory compliance and remediation of environmental damage, particularly at federal facilities like military bases.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the prime contractor is Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc., a large business. There is no explicit information on small business subcontracting participation in the provided data, which is a common area for oversight.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, part of the Department of Defense, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration necessitates continuous monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, al, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $31.3 million to SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.. 199709!2100!0551!CA21 !USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, !DACA2196D0018 !A!*!0004 !19970630!20011130!048985691!028655181!106521081!N!8X202!I T CORPORATION !312 DIRECTORS DR !KNOXVILLE !TN!37923!63912!089!01!REDSTONE ARSENAL !MADISON !ALABAMA !0001!+000003363318!N!N!000000000000!F999!OTHER ENVIRON SVCS, STUDIES, & ANALYTICAL SUPPORT !S1 !SERVICES !1ZDE!DEF ENVIR & RESTORA PRG (DERP)!8744!5!B!S!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!0

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1997-06-30. End: 2008-11-30.

What specific environmental services were included in this contract, and how did the scope evolve over its 10-year duration?

The contract covered 'OTHER ENVIRON SVCS, STUDIES, & ANALYTICAL SUPPORT' for the USA Engineer District. While the data doesn't detail the specific services, it likely included environmental assessments, remediation, monitoring, and compliance support at Redstone Arsenal. The long duration suggests a broad and potentially evolving scope, requiring diligent contract management to track changes and ensure alignment with original objectives and taxpayer value.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how was Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. evaluated against them?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Effective oversight would require clearly defined metrics related to environmental cleanup targets, compliance adherence, reporting accuracy, and project timelines. Without this information, assessing the contractor's performance and the overall effectiveness of the contract in achieving its environmental goals is challenging.

Were there any significant cost variances or change orders throughout the contract's lifecycle, and how were they justified?

The data does not detail cost variances or change orders. For a contract spanning over a decade, it is common to have adjustments due to unforeseen site conditions, regulatory changes, or evolving mission requirements. Robust contract management would involve rigorous justification, review, and approval processes for any modifications to ensure they remain in the government's best interest and do not unduly inflate costs for taxpayers.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Shaw Group Inc., the (UEI: 180038382)

Address: 312 DIRECTORS DR, KNOXVILLE, TN, 37923

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DACA2196D0018

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 1997-06-30

Current End Date: 2008-11-30

Potential End Date: 2008-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-12

More Contracts from Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.

View all Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending