Navient Corporation awarded $81.7M for critical student loan servicing, facing scrutiny over past performance

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $81,708,265 ($81.7M)

Contractor: Navient Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Education

Start Date: 2014-01-01

End Date: 2014-08-31

Contract Duration: 242 days

Daily Burn Rate: $337.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF / CRITICAL FUNCTION TASK ORDER 0004 - SERVICING TITLE IV AID

Place of Performance

Location: WILKES BARRE, LUZERNE County, PENNSYLVANIA, 18706

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Education obligated $81.7 million to NAVIENT CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF / CRITICAL FUNCTION TASK ORDER 0004 - SERVICING TITLE IV AID Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. Fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment introduces potential for cost fluctuations. 3. Significant contract value indicates a critical function for the Department of Education. 4. Past performance concerns with Navient Corporation warrant close monitoring of service delivery. 5. The contract duration of 242 days is relatively short for a large-scale servicing task. 6. Geographic focus on Pennsylvania for this specific task order.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $81.7 million for a 242-day period is substantial. Benchmarking against similar student loan servicing contracts is difficult without more specific service details. However, given the contractor's history and the nature of student loan servicing, the value needs to be carefully assessed against performance metrics and potential risks. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment structure introduces uncertainty in the final cost.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of four bidders (no) suggests a degree of market interest. However, the effectiveness of this competition in driving down costs or ensuring the best value is tempered by concerns about the contractor's past performance and the specialized nature of student loan servicing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it promotes a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and service quality. However, if the lowest bidder has a history of performance issues, taxpayers may still face risks related to service disruptions or increased costs down the line.

Public Impact

Benefits federal student loan borrowers by ensuring continued servicing of their loans. Delivers essential services related to credit intermediation for federal student aid programs. Geographic impact is primarily focused on operations within Pennsylvania. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities within Navient Corporation's servicing operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the financial services sector, specifically focusing on credit intermediation and loan servicing. The market for federal student loan servicing is specialized, with a few large players dominating. The value of this contract, while significant, represents a portion of the overall federal spending on student loan administration, which can fluctuate based on policy and program needs.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract involved small business set-asides. Given the scale and specialized nature of federal student loan servicing, it is typically handled by larger, established firms. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are unlikely to be a significant component of this specific task order.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside with the Department of Education's contracting officers and program managers. Inspector General oversight may also be applicable, particularly concerning financial management and compliance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, but detailed performance metrics are often internal.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-services, department-of-education, pennsylvania, fixed-price-economic-price-adjustment, large-contract, full-and-open-competition, credit-intermediation, student-loans, navient-corporation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Education awarded $81.7 million to NAVIENT CORPORATION. IGF::CT::IGF / CRITICAL FUNCTION TASK ORDER 0004 - SERVICING TITLE IV AID

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NAVIENT CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Education (Department of Education).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $81.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-01-01. End: 2014-08-31.

What specific past performance issues has Navient Corporation faced related to federal student loan servicing?

Navient Corporation has a documented history of facing significant scrutiny and legal actions concerning its student loan servicing practices. These have included allegations of steering borrowers into repayment plans that increased their interest costs, failing to provide timely and accurate information about repayment options, and mishandling borrower communications. For instance, Navient reached a multi-state settlement in 2022 to resolve allegations of misconduct in servicing federal and private student loans. These past issues raise concerns about the quality and reliability of their servicing operations and the potential impact on borrowers and federal program integrity.

How does the pricing structure (Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment) compare to typical student loan servicing contracts?

Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FPEPA) contracts are less common for standard service delivery compared to firm-fixed-price contracts. While FPEPA aims to provide some cost stability, the economic price adjustment clause allows for modifications based on specified economic factors (e.g., inflation, labor costs). In the context of student loan servicing, where operational costs can be relatively stable, this structure might introduce unnecessary complexity and potential for cost increases that are not directly tied to performance. Many similar contracts might opt for firm-fixed-price to ensure greater cost predictability for the government.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) likely being used to evaluate Navient's performance on this contract?

Key performance indicators for federal student loan servicing contracts typically include metrics such as borrower satisfaction rates, accuracy of billing and payment processing, timeliness of responses to borrower inquiries, adherence to regulatory requirements, and successful management of repayment plans. For this specific contract, the Department of Education would likely monitor Navient's ability to efficiently manage loan portfolios, minimize default rates through effective counseling, and maintain compliance with all federal regulations and program guidelines. Given past issues, KPIs related to borrower complaint resolution and accurate information dissemination would be particularly critical.

What is the historical spending trend for student loan servicing contracts awarded by the Department of Education?

Historical spending on federal student loan servicing contracts by the Department of Education has been substantial and subject to fluctuations based on legislative changes, the volume of federal student loans, and shifts in servicing models (e.g., consolidation of loan types, changes in privatization). In recent years, the Department has managed a vast portfolio, leading to significant annual expenditures on servicing contracts. Spending can vary year-to-year due to contract renewals, re-competitions, and policy decisions regarding the management of federal student debt. Analyzing specific spending trends requires a review of budget allocations and contract awards over multiple fiscal years.

What is the potential financial risk to the government if Navient's performance is subpar on this contract?

The potential financial risk to the government if Navient's performance is subpar on this contract is multifaceted. Firstly, poor servicing could lead to increased default rates on federal student loans, resulting in direct financial losses for the government. Secondly, inadequate borrower support and communication might necessitate additional government intervention or remediation efforts, incurring further costs. Thirdly, if the economic price adjustment clause is triggered unfavorably, the government could end up paying more than initially anticipated without a corresponding improvement in service quality. Finally, reputational damage to federal student aid programs could also be considered an indirect financial risk.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Finance and InsuranceActivities Related to Credit IntermediationOther Activities Related to Credit Intermediation

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 123 S JUSTISON ST STE 300, WILMINGTON, DE, 19801

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $81,708,265

Exercised Options: $81,708,265

Current Obligation: $81,708,265

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: EDFSA09D0015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-01-01

Current End Date: 2014-08-31

Potential End Date: 2014-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-04-04

More Contracts from Navient Corporation

View all Navient Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Education Contracts

View all Department of Education contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending