Straub Construction awarded $18.7M for runway and airfield lighting repairs, highlighting significant infrastructure investment
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,707,317 ($18.7M)
Contractor: Straub Construction, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-02-18
End Date: 2014-03-15
Contract Duration: 1,121 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: RUNWAY&AIRFIELD LIGHTING REPAIRS, MARB
Place of Performance
Location: MARCH ARB, RIVERSIDE County, CALIFORNIA, 92518
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $18.7 million to STRAUB CONSTRUCTION, INC. for work described as: RUNWAY&AIRFIELD LIGHTING REPAIRS, MARB Key points: 1. Contract value of $18.7 million indicates a substantial investment in critical airfield infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for airfield maintenance services. 3. The contract duration of 1121 days points to a complex and lengthy repair project. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 5. The project is categorized under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, indicating a focus on physical infrastructure. 6. Awarded by the Department of the Army, this contract supports military aviation readiness.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $18.7 million for runway and airfield lighting repairs appears reasonable given the scope of infrastructure work. Without specific per-unit cost data or direct comparisons to similar airfield lighting repair contracts, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the full and open competition suggests that pricing was likely vetted against multiple market participants, which typically drives competitive pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 4 bidders (indicated by 'no': 4) suggests a competitive environment for this type of specialized construction service. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more robust price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently, as multiple companies vied for the contract, driving down prices through competitive bidding.
Public Impact
Military personnel and aircraft operating from the affected airfield benefit from improved safety and operational efficiency. The services delivered include essential repairs to runway and airfield lighting systems, crucial for navigation and safety. The geographic impact is localized to the specific military installation where the repairs are conducted. The contract supports jobs within the construction sector, particularly those with expertise in specialized airfield infrastructure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during the extensive repair work.
- Risk of project delays impacting airfield operations if contractor performance is suboptimal.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract structure limits the government's exposure to cost increases.
- Full and open competition likely resulted in a competitive bid, optimizing value.
- The contractor, Straub Construction, Inc., has experience in construction projects.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically addressing critical infrastructure for aviation. The market for airfield maintenance and repair is specialized, often involving government contracts due to the unique requirements of military and civilian airfields. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within Department of Defense infrastructure budgets for airfield upgrades and repairs.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to Straub Construction, Inc., a presumably larger entity given the contract value, suggests that the primary focus was on securing the necessary expertise and capacity for this significant infrastructure project rather than specifically promoting small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army project management office. Performance would be monitored against the contract's specifications and delivery schedule. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed project-specific oversight mechanisms are not explicitly stated in the provided data.
Related Government Programs
- Airfield Operations and Maintenance
- Military Infrastructure Modernization
- Federal Construction Contracts
- Department of Defense Procurement
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of cost escalation or obsolescence.
- Potential for operational disruptions due to extended repair work.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, runway-lighting, airfield-repairs, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, infrastructure, california, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $18.7 million to STRAUB CONSTRUCTION, INC.. RUNWAY&AIRFIELD LIGHTING REPAIRS, MARB
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is STRAUB CONSTRUCTION, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-02-18. End: 2014-03-15.
What is Straub Construction, Inc.'s track record with similar federal contracts, particularly for airfield infrastructure?
Analyzing Straub Construction, Inc.'s historical federal contract data would provide insight into their performance on similar projects. Specifically, examining past awards for airfield lighting, runway repairs, or other aviation-related infrastructure would reveal their experience, past performance ratings, and any history of contract modifications, delays, or disputes. A review of their contract portfolio would help assess their capacity and reliability for executing large-scale, specialized projects like the $18.7 million runway and airfield lighting repair contract awarded by the Department of the Army.
How does the per-square-foot cost of these runway and airfield lighting repairs compare to industry benchmarks?
To benchmark the value for money, a detailed cost breakdown of the repairs would be necessary. This would involve analyzing the cost per linear foot of lighting replaced, per square foot of runway resurfaced (if applicable), and the cost of associated electrical work. Comparing these unit costs against established industry benchmarks for airfield construction and maintenance, adjusted for geographic location and specific material requirements, would indicate whether the $18.7 million award represents a fair and reasonable price. Without such granular data, it is difficult to definitively assess the cost-effectiveness.
What are the primary risks associated with a 1121-day contract for airfield lighting repairs?
A contract duration of 1121 days (approximately three years) for airfield lighting repairs presents several risks. These include potential for material price escalation over the extended period, especially for specialized components. There's also a risk of technological obsolescence if new lighting standards or technologies emerge during the contract term. Furthermore, prolonged construction activities can lead to ongoing disruptions for airfield operations, potentially impacting training schedules and mission readiness. Contractor performance degradation over a long period and the potential for unforeseen site conditions discovered during phased repairs are also significant concerns.
What is the historical spending pattern for runway and airfield lighting repairs by the Department of the Army?
Examining the Department of the Army's historical spending on runway and airfield lighting repairs would provide context for the $18.7 million award. Analyzing spending over the past 5-10 years would reveal trends in contract values, frequency of awards, and the types of contractors typically engaged. Understanding this historical pattern can help determine if this contract represents a typical investment, a significant increase, or a decrease in spending for such services. It can also highlight any shifts in procurement strategies or the types of repairs being prioritized.
What performance metrics are typically used to evaluate the success of airfield lighting repair contracts?
The success of airfield lighting repair contracts is typically evaluated based on several key performance metrics. These include adherence to the project schedule, with timely completion of milestones and final delivery being crucial. Quality of workmanship, ensuring repairs meet all technical specifications and safety standards, is paramount. Cost control, particularly within a fixed-price contract, is also a measure of success. Furthermore, minimizing disruptions to airfield operations and ensuring the reliability and longevity of the new lighting systems are critical indicators of successful contract performance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912PL09R0052
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 202 W COLLEGE STE 201, FALLBROOK, CA, 92028
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,540,317
Exercised Options: $18,707,317
Current Obligation: $18,707,317
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 2
Total Subaward Amount: $156,833
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912PL10D0040
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-02-18
Current End Date: 2014-03-15
Potential End Date: 2014-03-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-08-02
More Contracts from Straub Construction, Inc.
- M 4TH ID CAB Attack Battalion Maintenance Hangar Construction, Pavements, Sitework&demo Located AT Fort Carson, CO — $62.9M (Department of Defense)
- P-1014 Truck Company Operations Complex — $54.5M (Department of Defense)
- P-378 Hangar Addition and Modernization, NAS Lemoore, CA — $53.6M (Department of Defense)
- Non-Industrial Macc - South — $46.9M (Department of Defense)
- Construction of the NEW Brownfield Border Patrol Station — $45.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)