DoD Awards $102M Engineering Services Contract to KBR Wyle Services, LLC for Aviation and Missile Command

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $102,214,211 ($102.2M)

Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-08-15

End Date: 2010-11-15

Contract Duration: 1,918 days

Daily Burn Rate: $53.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200511!004757!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0024 !A!N! !Y!0003 ! !20050815!20051231!098856339!098856339!098856339!N!CAS, INC !100 QUALITY CIRCLE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000001490655!Y!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !20200930!C! ! !N!Z!A!N!J!2!002! ! !Z!N!Z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !D!D!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35898

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $102.2 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 200511!004757!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0024 !A!N! !Y!0003 ! !20050815!20051231!098856339!098856339!098856339!N!CAS, INC !100 QUALITY CIRCLE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Engineering Services to support USA Aviation and Missile Command. 2. KBR Wyle Services, LLC secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract has a duration of 1918 days, indicating a long-term need. 4. The sector is primarily IT and Defense-related services, with a focus on engineering.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $102,214,211.25 for engineering services appears reasonable given the 1918-day duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering support contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally maximizes taxpayer value by ensuring the government receives the best possible pricing and services.

Public Impact

Supports critical aviation and missile defense programs for the U.S. Army. Ensures continued engineering expertise for national security initiatives. Potential for follow-on work or expansion of services based on performance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in long-term engineering contracts.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical support services.
Economic fluctuations could impact future funding for such programs.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Contract supports vital national defense functions.
Experienced contractor likely to provide high-quality services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense-related research, development, and program management. Spending in this area is substantial within the Department of Defense, driven by the need for advanced technological capabilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to a large business entity. There is no direct indication of small business subcontracting opportunities within this specific award notice.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for major contracts. The award through full and open competition suggests a degree of accountability in the selection process.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of cost overruns or scope creep.
Sole contractor for critical support services could pose a risk if performance falters.
Potential for economic shifts impacting long-term defense budgets.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the award notice requires further investigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $102.2 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. 200511!004757!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0024 !A!N! !Y!0003 ! !20050815!20051231!098856339!098856339!098856339!N!CAS, INC !100 QUALITY CIRCLE !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000001490655!Y!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $102.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-08-15. End: 2010-11-15.

What specific engineering disciplines are covered under this contract, and how do they align with current and future Army modernization priorities?

The contract specifies 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' and a NAICS code of '541330' (Engineering Services). While the exact disciplines aren't detailed, this typically encompasses a broad range of engineering expertise, including systems engineering, mechanical, electrical, and aerospace engineering, crucial for developing and maintaining advanced aviation and missile systems. Alignment with modernization priorities would depend on the specific task orders issued under the contract.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate KBR Wyle Services, LLC's performance on this contract, and what are the potential consequences for underperformance?

Specific KPIs are not detailed in this award notice. However, standard government contracting practices involve performance metrics related to schedule adherence, quality of deliverables, cost control, and responsiveness. Underperformance could lead to contractual remedies such as corrective action requests, reduced award fees, or even termination for default, depending on the severity and nature of the deficiencies.

How does the $102 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar program management and support services for the Aviation and Missile Command?

Without historical spending data for this specific command and service type, a direct comparison is difficult. However, $102 million over approximately five years (based on the start and end dates) represents a significant but not necessarily excessive investment for comprehensive program management and engineering support for complex defense systems like aviation and missiles.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: KBR, Inc.

Address: 100 QUALITY CIR NW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W31P4Q05A0024

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline