DoD's $12.6M Swain Annex Addition contract awarded to Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc. under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,567,837 ($12.6M)

Contractor: Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-09-29

End Date: 2008-08-04

Contract Duration: 675 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 17

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCT SWAIN ANNEX ADDITION/HOCHMUTH

Place of Performance

Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.6 million to COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC. for work described as: CONSTRUCT SWAIN ANNEX ADDITION/HOCHMUTH Key points: 1. Contract awarded for building construction services. 2. Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc. is the prime contractor. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The contract duration was 675 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12.6 million for a building addition appears within a reasonable range for similar construction projects, though specific scope details are needed for precise benchmarking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process that should have driven price discovery and secured a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were utilized through a competitive process, aiming for value for money in the construction of a government facility.

Public Impact

Construction of a new annex addition to the Swain building. Supports the operational needs of the Department of the Navy. Provides updated facilities for government personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector is substantial, driven by government and private infrastructure needs. Benchmarks vary widely based on project scale and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses, either as prime or subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small business participation goals were considered or met through subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Awarded as a delivery order under a larger contract, oversight would likely be managed by the Department of the Navy contracting office. Accountability for project completion and quality rests with the prime contractor.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.6 million to COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC.. CONSTRUCT SWAIN ANNEX ADDITION/HOCHMUTH

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COAKLEY & WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-29. End: 2008-08-04.

What was the specific scope of work for the Swain Annex Addition, and how did it compare to similar construction projects in the region?

The provided data lacks specific details on the scope of work for the Swain Annex Addition. A comprehensive comparison to similar regional construction projects would require information on square footage, materials, specialized systems, and site conditions to accurately assess value and potential cost deviations.

Were there any performance issues or cost overruns during the contract period, and how were they managed?

The available data does not detail performance issues or cost overruns. Post-award contract performance reports and financial statements would be necessary to assess any challenges encountered during the 675-day duration and the effectiveness of their management by the Department of the Navy.

What was the rationale for not including small business participation goals in this contract, and were there opportunities missed for small business engagement?

The data does not specify the rationale for the absence of small business participation. It's possible that the nature of the work or the contracting vehicle used did not lend itself to small business set-asides. Further review of the contract file would clarify if opportunities were assessed and why small businesses were not involved.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 17

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 16 S SUMMIT AVE STE 300, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20877

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,617,837

Exercised Options: $12,617,837

Current Obligation: $12,567,837

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247704D0034

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2006-09-29

Current End Date: 2008-08-04

Potential End Date: 2008-08-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-08-03

More Contracts from Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc.

View all Coakley & Williams Construction, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending