Naval Sea Systems Command contract for program management/support services awarded to EG&G Technical Services, Inc. for over $14.7 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,765,683 ($14.8M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2001-07-09

End Date: 2007-03-31

Contract Duration: 2,091 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200110!016320!1700!BZ005 !NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0002401D7019 !A!N!*!Y!0003 !20010709!20050208!083070925!083070925!187613711!N!EG&G TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000008615749!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!*!*!5!B!M! !*!*!*!B!*!*!N!Z!A !N!J!2!003!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: GERMANTOWN, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20876

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.8 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200110!016320!1700!BZ005 !NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0002401D7019 !A!N!*!Y!0003 !20010709!20050208!083070925!083070925!187613711!N!EG&G TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for program management and support services, indicating a need for specialized expertise in managing complex naval programs. 2. The contract duration of over 2000 days suggests a long-term requirement for these services. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, implying a robust bidding process. 4. The primary service category is 'Electronics and Communication', suggesting a focus on technical support within this domain. 5. The contract's value of over $14.7 million positions it as a significant investment in naval program support. 6. The contractor, EG&G Technical Services, Inc., was selected through a competitive process, suggesting they met specific technical and cost requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $14.7 million over its duration appears reasonable for specialized program management and support services within the defense sector. Benchmarking against similar contracts for engineering and management support services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the scope and cost, with the contractor bearing the risk of cost overruns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of multiple bidders (3 noted) suggests a healthy level of competition, which typically drives down prices and encourages innovation. The specific details of the bidding process and the number of proposals received would further clarify the extent of competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government receives the best possible value through a competitive bidding process, leading to potentially lower costs and higher quality services.

Public Impact

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) benefits from specialized program management and support services, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of naval operations. The contract delivers essential support for electronics and communication systems, crucial for maintaining naval technological superiority. The services provided likely contribute to the readiness and operational capability of the U.S. Navy. The contract supports a workforce skilled in program management, engineering, and technical support within the defense industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if program management requirements are not clearly defined and controlled.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical program support could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Ensuring continued alignment with evolving naval technology requirements throughout the contract's long duration.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive selection process.
Firm fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
Contractor EG&G Technical Services, Inc. has a track record in providing technical services, suggesting relevant expertise.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader defense sector, specifically supporting naval systems. The market for program management and technical support services for defense agencies is substantial, driven by the complexity and scale of military operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts awarded by NAVSEA or similar defense organizations for engineering, technical, and program management support, particularly those focused on electronics and communication systems.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. As it was awarded under full and open competition, it is unlikely that small businesses were exclusively targeted. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill specific aspects of the contract, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem within the defense industry.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) contracting officer and their representatives. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific details of performance may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Naval Ship Systems Engineering
Defense Program Management Services
Electronics and Communication Systems Support
Naval Warfare Systems Command Contracts
Department of Defense Engineering Services

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Scope Definition
Performance Monitoring

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.8 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.. 200110!016320!1700!BZ005 !NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0002401D7019 !A!N!*!Y!0003 !20010709!20050208!083070925!083070925!187613711!N!EG&G TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC !900 CLOPPER ROAD !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20878!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000008615749!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!*!*!5!B!M! !*!*!*!B!*!*!N!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-07-09. End: 2007-03-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for program management and support services by the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) in the electronics and communication sector?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for NAVSEA in program management and support services, particularly within the electronics and communication sector, requires access to comprehensive contract databases. This specific contract, awarded in 2001 for over $14.7 million, represents a portion of NAVSEA's overall investment in these areas. Trends would likely show a consistent need for such services due to the continuous evolution of naval technology and the complexity of managing large-scale defense programs. Factors influencing spending include defense budgets, technological advancements, and strategic priorities. A detailed analysis would involve examining contract awards over several fiscal years, identifying key contractors, and tracking the aggregate value of contracts within this service category to understand fluctuations and sustained investment levels.

How does the per-unit cost of EG&G Technical Services, Inc.'s services compare to market rates for similar program management and support contracts?

Determining the precise per-unit cost for this contract is challenging without detailed breakdowns of labor categories, hours, and specific deliverables. The contract is a firm fixed-price award for program management and support services, valued at over $14.7 million. To compare its per-unit cost to market rates, one would need to identify comparable contracts awarded around the same period (2001-2007) by similar defense agencies (e.g., other Naval commands, Air Force, Army) for similar services (engineering support, program management, technical services). Key metrics for comparison could include cost per direct labor hour, cost per management hour, or cost per system supported. Without access to proprietary pricing data or detailed contract line item numbers (CLINs) from this specific award and its comparables, a definitive benchmark is difficult to establish. However, the full and open competition suggests the pricing was deemed competitive at the time of award.

What is the track record of EG&G Technical Services, Inc. in delivering program management and support services to the Department of Defense prior to this contract?

EG&G Technical Services, Inc. (which later became part of URS Federal Services, Inc. and subsequently AECOM) had a significant track record in providing technical and support services to the Department of Defense and other government agencies prior to this 2001 award. Their expertise typically spanned areas such as engineering, logistics, technical support, and program management across various defense platforms and systems. The company was known for its ability to support complex projects and provide specialized technical solutions. The award of this substantial contract by NAVSEA suggests that EG&G met the government's requirements and demonstrated a capability to handle program management and support for naval electronics and communication systems, likely building upon prior successful performance in related domains.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this program management and support services contract?

While specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this particular contract are not detailed in the provided data, typical KPIs for program management and support services contracts in the defense sector often include: timely delivery of reports and documentation, adherence to project milestones and schedules, successful completion of assigned tasks within scope, effective cost management (especially relevant if there were cost-reimbursable elements, though this is firm fixed-price), quality of technical analysis and recommendations, and overall client satisfaction. For a contract focused on electronics and communication systems, KPIs might also relate to system readiness, technical issue resolution time, and support provided for system upgrades or maintenance. The firm fixed-price nature implies that meeting the defined scope and schedule within the agreed price is a primary measure of success.

How has the scope of program management and support services for naval electronics and communication systems evolved since this contract was awarded?

Since this contract was awarded in 2001, the scope of program management and support services for naval electronics and communication systems has undergone significant evolution, driven by rapid technological advancements and changing geopolitical landscapes. Key shifts include the increasing integration of cyber security requirements into all aspects of system management, the rise of data analytics and artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance and operational efficiency, and the growing emphasis on networked warfare and interoperability across different platforms and domains. Furthermore, there's been a greater focus on agile methodologies in program management to adapt more quickly to evolving threats and technological opportunities. The complexity of managing integrated electronic warfare systems, communication networks, and sensor fusion has also increased substantially, requiring more sophisticated program oversight and technical expertise than was common two decades ago.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 900 CLOPPER ROAD, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20878

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0002401D7019

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline