DoD's $53M safety upgrade contract awarded to Parsons Government Services International Inc. for CWSF

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $52,946,332 ($52.9M)

Contractor: Parsons Government Services International Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-07-06

End Date: 2014-08-29

Contract Duration: 784 days

Daily Burn Rate: $67.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: PROVIDE SAFETY AND SECURITY UPGRADES AT CWSF.

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $52.9 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC. for work described as: PROVIDE SAFETY AND SECURITY UPGRADES AT CWSF. Key points: 1. The contract focused on safety and security upgrades, indicating a critical need for enhanced facility protection. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market for these specialized services. 3. The duration of the contract (784 days) points to a significant scope of work and potential for extended engagement. 4. The 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' NAICS code suggests a broad range of technical expertise was required. 5. The contract type, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, can lead to cost overruns if not carefully managed. 6. The absence of small business set-aside indicates the primary contractor was selected based on overall capability rather than specific small business goals.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific details on the scope of 'safety and security upgrades.' However, the total award amount of over $52.9 million for a 784-day period suggests a substantial investment. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type, while allowing flexibility, carries inherent risks of cost escalation compared to fixed-price contracts. Without comparable project data or detailed cost breakdowns, it's difficult to definitively assess if the pricing represents excellent value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This typically fosters a competitive environment, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. The fact that there were 8 bids received suggests a healthy level of interest and competition within the market for these specialized services.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government receives the best possible pricing and services through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the personnel and operations at the CWSF (Chemical Weapons Storage Facility), which benefit from enhanced safety and security. The services delivered include critical infrastructure upgrades aimed at mitigating risks associated with the facility's operations. The geographic impact is localized to the CWSF site, ensuring the security of a specific, high-risk federal installation. The contract likely supported a workforce of technical specialists, engineers, and construction personnel involved in the upgrade process.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically under NAICS code 541990. This broad category encompasses a wide array of specialized services. The market for such services is often driven by government needs for technical expertise in areas like facility management, engineering, and security. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific nature of the safety and security upgrades, but large-scale infrastructure projects for defense facilities can run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates no indication of small business subcontracting. This suggests that the primary contractor, Parsons Government Services International Inc., was selected based on its overall capabilities and capacity to perform the extensive safety and security upgrades. The absence of set-asides means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract were likely limited to subcontracting roles, if any were pursued by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Defense's Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA). As a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, rigorous financial oversight and auditing would be crucial to monitor expenditures and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate. Transparency would be facilitated through contract reporting mechanisms, and the Inspector General's office for the Department of Defense would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, dtra, facility-upgrades, safety-and-security, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, parsons-government-services-international-inc, cwsf

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $52.9 million to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC.. PROVIDE SAFETY AND SECURITY UPGRADES AT CWSF.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Threat Reduction Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $52.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-07-06. End: 2014-08-29.

What specific safety and security upgrades were performed under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'PROVIDE SAFETY AND SECURITY UPGRADES AT CWSF.' However, the specific nature of these upgrades is not detailed. CWSF typically refers to a Chemical Weapons Storage Facility. Therefore, the upgrades likely involved enhancing physical security measures (e.g., access control, surveillance, perimeter security), improving fire suppression systems, ensuring structural integrity against potential threats, and implementing advanced monitoring systems for hazardous materials. The exact scope would have been defined in the detailed contract statement of work, which is not publicly available in this data extract.

How does the $52.9 million award compare to similar safety and security upgrade contracts at federal facilities?

Direct comparison is difficult without knowing the precise scope and scale of the upgrades at CWSF. However, large-scale security and infrastructure modernization projects at federal facilities, especially those handling sensitive materials like chemical weapons, can easily reach tens of millions of dollars. For instance, upgrades to military bases or critical infrastructure sites often involve significant investments in hardening facilities, improving surveillance, and enhancing emergency response capabilities. The $52.9 million for a nearly two-year project appears substantial but potentially within the expected range for specialized, high-security federal installations.

What are the risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this project?

The primary risk with a CPFF contract is cost overrun. While the contractor receives a fixed fee for their effort, the government bears the cost of all allowable expenses. If the contractor's costs exceed initial estimates, the total contract price increases. This necessitates robust government oversight to scrutinize incurred costs, ensure they are reasonable and allocable to the contract, and prevent inefficiencies. For a project involving complex safety and security upgrades, unforeseen technical challenges or material cost fluctuations could drive up expenses, making diligent cost management by the contracting agency critical.

What was the track record of Parsons Government Services International Inc. prior to this award?

Parsons Government Services International Inc. is a subsidiary of Parsons Corporation, a well-established engineering, construction, technical, and management services firm with a long history of supporting government contracts, including significant work with the Department of Defense. While specific performance details for this exact contract are not in the provided data, Parsons has a broad portfolio of complex projects globally. Their track record generally includes large-scale infrastructure, defense, and security-related projects, suggesting they possess the requisite experience and capability for a contract of this nature.

How does the competition level (8 bidders) impact the value received by taxpayers?

A competition level of 8 bidders for a 'full and open' contract is generally considered healthy. A higher number of bidders typically indicates a more competitive marketplace, which pressures contractors to offer more favorable pricing and terms to win the contract. This increased competition can lead to better value for taxpayers by driving down the overall cost of the services and encouraging the selection of the most capable and cost-effective provider. Conversely, very low competition might suggest market limitations or potential issues that could lead to higher prices.

What is the significance of the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' NAICS code in assessing this contract?

The NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,' is a broad catch-all category. Its use here suggests that the contract encompassed a diverse range of specialized services that did not fit neatly into more specific categories like engineering, architectural, or environmental consulting. This broad classification can make it challenging to benchmark costs or assess performance against industry standards without further details on the specific tasks performed. It implies the government required a unique combination of expertise or a flexible service provider capable of adapting to evolving needs during the project.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: HDTRA111R0007

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Parsons Corporation

Address: 100 W WALNUT ST, PASADENA, CA, 91124

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $53,042,820

Exercised Options: $53,042,820

Current Obligation: $52,946,332

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 8

Total Subaward Amount: $30,731,910

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HDTRA111D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-07-06

Current End Date: 2014-08-29

Potential End Date: 2014-08-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-07-11

More Contracts from Parsons Government Services International Inc.

View all Parsons Government Services International Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending