DoD Awards $39.2M for Electronics & Communication Equipment Development, Extending Contract to 2011

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,236,546 ($39.2M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 1998-09-14

End Date: 2011-04-14

Contract Duration: 4,595 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 199812!2100!3983!AB07 !USA COMM-ELECTRONICS COMMAND !DAAB0798DH502 !A!*!0003 !19980914!20000728!101458586!101458586!101458586!N!89185!ARINC INCORPORATED !2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRINCE GEORGE S !MARYLAND !0001!+000006803580!N!N!000000000000!AC63!RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-ADV TECH DEV !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!5!B!M!*!B!A!*!A !N!Y!2!006!B!* !C!N!Z!* !* !N!C!*!C!C!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: ANNAPOLIS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21401

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $39.2 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC for work described as: 199812!2100!3983!AB07 !USA COMM-ELECTRONICS COMMAND !DAAB0798DH502 !A!*!0003 !19980914!20000728!101458586!101458586!101458586!N!89185!ARINC INCORPORATED !2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRINCE… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for advanced technology development in electronics and communication. 2. Significant contract value of $39.2 million over its extended period. 3. Competition type is 'Full and Open', suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically focusing on advanced technology development.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $39.2 million over approximately 13 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific unit costs or detailed deliverables, a precise pricing assessment is difficult, but the duration implies a sustained need.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition', indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

Advancement in defense communication technology benefits national security. Long-term contract provides stability for the contractor and ensures continued development. Potential for technological spin-offs benefiting commercial sectors. Investment in R&D for critical defense systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on the research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDTE) of electronics and communication equipment. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining technological superiority.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. The primary contractor, ARINC INCORPORATED, is a large business, suggesting limited direct opportunity for small businesses in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Department of Defense, likely through the Defense Contract Management Agency. Oversight would focus on technical progress, cost control, and adherence to contract terms, especially given the Time and Materials structure.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, md, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $39.2 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC. 199812!2100!3983!AB07 !USA COMM-ELECTRONICS COMMAND !DAAB0798DH502 !A!*!0003 !19980914!20000728!101458586!101458586!101458586!N!89185!ARINC INCORPORATED !2551 RIVA RD !ANNAPOLIS !MD!21401!45825!033!24!LARGO !PRINCE GEORGE S !MARYLAND !0001!+000006803580!N!N!000000000000!AC63!RDTE/ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-ADV TECH DEV !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8711!5!B!M!*!B!A!*!A !N!Y!2!0

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1998-09-14. End: 2011-04-14.

What specific technological advancements were achieved under this contract, and how do they compare to industry standards at the time of award and completion?

This contract focused on 'ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION EQ-ADV TECH DEV'. Without access to the specific technical reports or deliverables, it's impossible to detail the advancements. However, given the 1998 award date and 2011 completion, the technology developed would likely be significantly outdated by current standards. A comparison would require detailed analysis of the contract's technical scope against the technological landscape of the late 1990s and early 2000s.

How effectively did the 'Full and Open Competition' process ensure competitive pricing for this long-term, Time and Materials contract?

While 'Full and Open Competition' is designed to foster competitive pricing, the 'Time and Materials' contract type introduces inherent risks. The government paid for labor hours and material costs, which can escalate if not tightly managed. The long duration (over 13 years) further complicates price control. The effectiveness hinges on robust oversight and negotiation of labor rates and material markups throughout the contract's life.

What was the overall return on investment for the taxpayer, considering the $39.2 million expenditure on advanced technology development over more than a decade?

Assessing the ROI is challenging without knowing the specific outcomes and their impact. If the developed technology led to significant improvements in defense capabilities, cost savings in other areas, or successful technology transfers, the ROI could be positive. However, if the technology became obsolete or did not yield expected benefits, the ROI would be poor. The long duration and T&M structure suggest potential cost overruns that would negatively impact ROI.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Carlyle Partners IV, L.P. (UEI: 806367616)

Address: 2551 RIVA RD, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAB0798DH502

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 1998-09-14

Current End Date: 2011-04-14

Potential End Date: 2011-04-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-10-23

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending