DoD Awards $20.8M for ADP Support Equipment to Altech Services Inc. Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,808,847 ($20.8M)

Contractor: Altech Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-01-25

End Date: 2010-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,526 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200606!610369!2100!W91RUS!ACA, FORT HUACHUCA !W91RUS05D0001 !A!N! !N!0002 !04 !20060125!20060207!800191215!800191215!800191215!N!ALTECH SERVICES INC !1300 S MERIDIAN SUITE 325!OKLAHOMA CITY !OK!73108!38964!179!13!HINESVILLE !LIBERTY !GEORGIA !+000000056192!N!N!000000000000!7035!ADP SUPPORT EQUIP !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !517110!A!A!5!B!S!D! ! !99990909!B!E!Y!A! !A!U!J!1!004!B! !A!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! !B!Z! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FORT STEWART, LIBERTY County, GEORGIA, 31315

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.8 million to ALTECH SERVICES, INC. for work described as: 200606!610369!2100!W91RUS!ACA, FORT HUACHUCA !W91RUS05D0001 !A!N! !N!0002 !04 !20060125!20060207!800191215!800191215!800191215!N!ALTECH SERVICES INC !1300 S MERIDIAN SUITE 325!OKLAHOMA CITY !OK!73108!38964!179!13!HINESVILLE !LIBE… Key points: 1. The contract value is $20.8 million, awarded to Altech Services, Inc. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 3. The contract is for ADP Support Equipment, falling under the IT sector. 4. The duration of the contract is over 4 years, suggesting a significant need.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $20.8 million for ADP support equipment over approximately 4 years appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar IT support contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This method suggests that while competition was sought, specific sources may have been initially excluded, potentially impacting the breadth of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently, though the specific exclusion of sources warrants further review for optimal value.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation of critical ADP systems for the Department of the Army. Supports military readiness by providing necessary equipment and services. Potential for technology upgrades and improved efficiency in data processing. Creates and sustains jobs within the IT services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential impact of 'exclusion of sources' on ultimate price competitiveness.
Need to verify if ADP support equipment is current or legacy technology.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a competitive process.
Long-term contract duration suggests sustained need and potential for stable service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically related to ADP support equipment. Spending in this area is crucial for modern military operations, and benchmarks vary widely based on the specific technology and services required.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this award. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Standard DoD oversight mechanisms would apply, focusing on performance, financial management, and compliance.

Related Government Programs

Wired Telecommunications Carriers
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for suboptimal pricing due to 'exclusion of sources'.
Risk of supporting outdated technology if 'ADP Support Equip' refers to legacy systems.
Lack of detail on specific equipment necessitates further investigation.
No clear indication of small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.8 million to ALTECH SERVICES, INC.. 200606!610369!2100!W91RUS!ACA, FORT HUACHUCA !W91RUS05D0001 !A!N! !N!0002 !04 !20060125!20060207!800191215!800191215!800191215!N!ALTECH SERVICES INC !1300 S MERIDIAN SUITE 325!OKLAHOMA CITY !OK!73108!38964!179!13!HINESVILLE !LIBERTY !GEORGIA !+000000056192!N!N!000000000000!7035!ADP SUPPORT EQUIP !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !517110!A!A!5!B!S!D! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALTECH SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-01-25. End: 2010-03-31.

What specific types of ADP support equipment are covered under this contract, and how do they align with current technological standards?

The contract specifies 'ADP SUPPORT EQUIP' without further detail. Understanding the exact nature of this equipment is crucial. If it pertains to legacy systems, it might indicate a need for modernization. Conversely, if it includes cutting-edge hardware or software, it suggests investment in advanced capabilities. A review of the detailed statement of work would clarify this.

How did the 'exclusion of sources' in the competitive process potentially affect the final price and the range of available solutions?

The 'exclusion of sources' clause implies that not all potential vendors were considered, even in a full and open competition. This could limit the number of bids received and potentially reduce downward pressure on pricing. While the award was competitive, understanding the rationale for exclusion is key to assessing if the government secured the best possible value and a wide array of innovative solutions.

What is the projected return on investment or efficiency gain expected from this $20.8 million expenditure on ADP support equipment?

The provided data does not explicitly state the expected ROI or efficiency gains. However, the significant investment over more than four years suggests an expectation of improved operational effectiveness, enhanced data processing capabilities, or sustained critical system functionality. Quantifying these benefits would require access to the contract's performance metrics and objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Wired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite) › Wired Telecommunications Carriers

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Intellibridge, LLC (UEI: 805476137)

Address: 1300 S MERIDIAN SUITE 325, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73108

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Veteran Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Consolidated Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91RUS05D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline