DoD's $173.6M Printed Circuit Assembly Contract for Countermeasures Lacked Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $173,596,611 ($173.6M)

Contractor: General Dynamics-Ots, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-03-22

End Date: 2009-06-30

Contract Duration: 831 days

Daily Burn Rate: $208.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: CHAMELEON MOBILE COUNTER MEASURES UNITS

Place of Performance

Location: BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN County, VERMONT, 05401

State: Vermont Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $173.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC. for work described as: CHAMELEON MOBILE COUNTER MEASURES UNITS Key points: 1. Significant spending on electronic assemblies for naval countermeasures. 2. Sole-source award to General Dynamics-OTS raises competition concerns. 3. High contract value suggests potential for taxpayer savings through competition. 4. Focus on printed circuit assembly manufacturing within the defense sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $173.6 million for printed circuit assemblies is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to ascertain if this price represents fair market value compared to similar contracts for electronic assemblies.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This lack of competition limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition likely means taxpayers did not benefit from potential cost savings that could have been achieved through a more competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

Naval forces receive critical electronic components for countermeasure systems. Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the lack of competitive bidding. The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny of procurement practices.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the defense sector, specifically for electronic assemblies used in naval countermeasures. Spending on specialized electronic components can be high, but competitive sourcing is crucial for cost efficiency.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific involvement or benefit to small businesses in this sole-source contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were excluded or could have participated.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this large contract suggests potential weaknesses in oversight or justification for not seeking competitive bids. Accountability for the procurement decision is paramount.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

printed-circuit-assembly-electronic-asse, department-of-defense, vt, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $173.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC.. CHAMELEON MOBILE COUNTER MEASURES UNITS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $173.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-03-22. End: 2009-06-30.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED.' Without further documentation, the specific justification for this sole-source award is unknown. Typically, sole-source awards require a strong justification, such as a unique capability or urgent need, and agencies must demonstrate that competitive options were explored and found unsuitable.

How does the unit cost of these printed circuit assemblies compare to industry benchmarks for similar components, given the lack of competition?

Benchmarking the unit cost is challenging without a competitive baseline. The absence of competition means there's no market-driven price discovery. A thorough cost analysis, comparing the awarded price to commercial equivalents or other government contracts for similar assemblies, would be necessary to assess value for money.

What is the long-term strategic impact of relying on a single supplier for such critical electronic assemblies for naval countermeasures?

Sole-sourcing critical components can create long-term strategic risks, including supply chain vulnerability, potential price escalation over time, and reduced innovation. Dependence on one supplier may limit the Navy's flexibility in adopting newer technologies or responding to geopolitical shifts that affect the supplier's operations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingSemiconductor and Other Electronic Component ManufacturingPrinted Circuit Assembly (Electronic Assembly) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 128 LAKESIDE AVE, BURLINGTON, VT, 05401

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $173,596,611

Exercised Options: $173,596,611

Current Obligation: $173,596,611

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785407D7000

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-03-22

Current End Date: 2009-06-30

Potential End Date: 2009-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-10-17

More Contracts from General Dynamics-Ots, Inc.

View all General Dynamics-Ots, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending