DoD's $16.7M Army Barracks Contract Awarded to Caddell Construction Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,757,644 ($16.8M)

Contractor: Caddell Construction CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-07-12

End Date: 2009-02-19

Contract Duration: 588 days

Daily Burn Rate: $28.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BUILDING CONSTRUCTION

Place of Performance

Location: WARNER ROBINS, HOUSTON County, GEORGIA, 31088

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.8 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Key points: 1. The contract value is $16.76 million for building construction. 2. Caddell Construction Co., Inc. was the awardee. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code. 5. The contract duration was 588 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $16.76 million appears reasonable for a large construction project of this nature. Without specific details on the scope and complexity of the barracks, a direct comparison is difficult, but the award was made under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and promotes competitive pricing. The use of Firm Fixed Price contract type further incentivizes cost control by the contractor.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better value for taxpayers by ensuring the government receives the most competitive pricing available in the market.

Public Impact

This contract supports the Department of the Army's infrastructure needs, likely providing improved living quarters for service members. The construction project contributes to the local economy in Georgia through job creation and material procurement. The award to Caddell Construction Co., Inc. signifies their capability in securing significant government contracts. The project's completion contributes to the overall readiness and operational capacity of military personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the scope of work and potential change orders.
Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during construction.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to meet quality and timeline requirements.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating competitive pricing.
Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage costs.
Project addresses critical infrastructure needs for the Army.
Contractor has a history of government contract awards (implied by winning this bid).

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector by the Department of Defense is substantial, supporting military base infrastructure and operational readiness. Benchmarks for similar projects would depend heavily on location, size, and specific requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and the awardee is Caddell Construction Co., Inc., a known large contractor. There is no specific indication of small business participation or subcontracting in the provided data, which is a common area for oversight in large construction contracts.

Oversight & Accountability

The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a robust process. However, ongoing oversight would be necessary to ensure the project stays within budget, meets quality standards, and is completed on time, especially given the firm fixed price nature of the contract.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep or change orders impacting final cost.
Contractor performance risk (quality, schedule adherence).
Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals mentioned.
Dependence on fixed price may lead to contractor cutting corners if not properly monitored.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.8 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-07-12. End: 2009-02-19.

What was the specific scope of work for the barracks construction, and how did it compare to similar projects in terms of complexity and cost?

The provided data lacks specific details on the scope of work for the barracks construction. To assess value, a comparison would require information on the square footage, number of personnel to be housed, specific amenities, and any unique structural or environmental requirements. Without this, it's difficult to definitively benchmark the $16.76 million against similar projects, though the competitive award process suggests a reasonable market price was achieved.

What were the primary risks identified during the bidding process, and how were they mitigated by the contract terms?

Key risks in construction contracts often include unforeseen site conditions, material cost fluctuations, labor availability, and schedule delays. The firm fixed price (FFP) contract structure places the risk of cost overruns primarily on the contractor, Caddell Construction. However, the government still bears risk related to contractor performance, quality control, and potential disputes arising from contract ambiguities or scope changes.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayer dollars in this specific award?

The full and open competition process is designed to maximize the number of potential bidders, thereby fostering a competitive environment that should yield the best value. Given that Caddell Construction won the bid, it implies their proposal was deemed the most advantageous based on price and other factors. The effectiveness is further supported by the firm fixed price contract, which locks in costs and incentivizes efficient project execution by the contractor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: FA300207R9001

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2700 LAGOON PARK DR, MONTGOMERY, AL, 36109

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,757,644

Exercised Options: $16,757,644

Current Obligation: $16,757,644

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA300207D0006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline