Fort Bragg construction contract awarded to Caddell Construction for $99.7M, completed on time
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $99,752,780 ($99.8M)
Contractor: Caddell Construction CO., Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-09-30
End Date: 2010-10-13
Contract Duration: 743 days
Daily Burn Rate: $134.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: BASE BID ITEMS (0001-0025) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 108TH ADA, FORT BRAGG, NC
Place of Performance
Location: FORT BRAGG, CUMBERLAND County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28307
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $99.8 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: BASE BID ITEMS (0001-0025) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 108TH ADA, FORT BRAGG, NC Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in military infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type offers cost certainty for the government. 4. Project completion within the original timeframe indicates effective project management. 5. The contract falls within the broader category of commercial and institutional building construction. 6. North Carolina location highlights regional economic impact and workforce utilization.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's final value of $99.7 million for the 108th ADA at Fort Bragg appears reasonable for a large-scale construction project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the government secured predictable costs, which is a positive indicator for financial management. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to independent cost estimates, a definitive assessment of optimal pricing is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this project. While multiple bidders are positive, the exact number can influence price discovery. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing, whereas fewer bidders might suggest market limitations or a highly specialized project.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage efficiency from contractors.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army units stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, who will utilize the new 108th ADA facilities. The project delivered essential infrastructure, likely including barracks, training areas, or support facilities, enhancing military readiness. The geographic impact is concentrated in North Carolina, specifically around the Fort Bragg installation. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction workers, engineers, and support staff in the region during the contract period.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if initial bids did not fully account for all project complexities.
- Risk of schedule delays if unforeseen site conditions or material shortages occurred.
- Quality control challenges inherent in large-scale construction projects.
- Dependence on a single prime contractor (Caddell Construction) for overall project delivery.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Completion within the specified duration suggests effective project management and execution.
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a potentially robust bidding process.
- The contractor, Caddell Construction, likely has a track record in large-scale military construction.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this area often supports military installations, government facilities, and public infrastructure. The market for large-scale military construction is typically dominated by a few large, experienced firms capable of handling complex projects with stringent security and logistical requirements. Benchmarks for similar military construction projects would typically range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on scope and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While Caddell Construction is a large firm, the subcontracting opportunities generated by this project could potentially benefit small businesses in the North Carolina region. The extent of small business participation would depend on Caddell's subcontracting plan and the availability of qualified small business subcontractors for various trades and services.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this Department of the Army contract would typically involve contracting officers, project managers, and potentially quality assurance representatives from the Army Corps of Engineers or a similar entity. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, with penalties for non-performance or delays. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed project-specific oversight reports may not always be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Fort Bragg Infrastructure Projects
- Department of Defense Military Construction
- Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts
- Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) related construction
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if initial estimates were inaccurate.
- Risk of schedule delays due to unforeseen site conditions or material availability.
- Quality assurance challenges in large-scale construction.
- Contractor performance history should be reviewed for similar projects.
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, fort-bragg, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, north-carolina, large-project, military-infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $99.8 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. BASE BID ITEMS (0001-0025) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 108TH ADA, FORT BRAGG, NC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $99.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-09-30. End: 2010-10-13.
What is Caddell Construction Co., Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly on similar large-scale military construction projects?
Caddell Construction Co., Inc. has a substantial history of working with the Department of Defense and other federal agencies on large-scale construction projects. They specialize in military construction, including barracks, training facilities, and operational support buildings. Their portfolio often includes projects at various military installations across the United States and overseas. A review of their past performance ratings and any documented issues on previous DoD contracts would provide further insight into their reliability and capability for projects of this magnitude. Their experience suggests they are well-positioned to handle the complexities and requirements typical of military construction.
How does the final contract value of $99.7 million compare to the initial base bid and any subsequent modifications?
The provided data shows a base bid value of $99,752,780, which appears to be the final awarded amount. The absence of separate figures for modifications suggests that either the project was completed very close to the initial bid, or significant modifications were not reflected in this summary data. A firm fixed-price contract generally aims to limit changes, but unforeseen circumstances can lead to change orders. Understanding if the final cost deviated from the initial bid, and the reasons for any deviations, is crucial for assessing value. If the project was completed at the bid price, it indicates strong initial planning and cost control.
What were the primary risk indicators identified during the bidding process for this Fort Bragg construction project?
While specific risk indicators from the bidding process are not detailed in the provided summary, common risks for large military construction projects include unforeseen site conditions (e.g., soil stability, environmental hazards), material cost volatility, labor availability and cost, and potential design changes. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract shifts much of this risk to the contractor, Caddell Construction. The government's risk is primarily related to ensuring adequate oversight to prevent scope creep and ensure quality. The number of bidders (3) might suggest that the perceived risks were manageable enough for multiple firms to compete.
How effective was the project management in ensuring the construction of the 108th ADA was completed within the 743-day duration?
The contract duration was 743 days, and the end date (2010-10-13) relative to the start date (2008-09-30) confirms completion within this timeframe. This suggests effective project management by both the contractor, Caddell Construction, and the overseeing government agency. Successful completion on schedule for a project of this scale indicates robust planning, efficient resource allocation, proactive problem-solving, and strong coordination between all parties involved. Delays in military construction can be costly and impact operational readiness, making timely completion a significant indicator of success.
What is the historical spending trend for similar commercial and institutional building construction contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?
Historical spending on similar construction contracts by the Department of the Army is substantial, reflecting the continuous need to build, maintain, and modernize military installations. This specific contract of approximately $99.7 million fits within the typical range for major construction projects at large bases like Fort Bragg. Spending trends in this category are influenced by military readiness requirements, force structure changes, and infrastructure upgrade initiatives. Over the years, the Army has consistently allocated significant portions of its budget to construction, often managed through the Army Corps of Engineers, with contract values frequently reaching tens or hundreds of millions of dollars for individual projects.
Were there any significant challenges or disputes encountered during the execution of this contract?
The provided summary data does not explicitly detail any significant challenges or disputes encountered during the execution of this contract. However, for large-scale construction projects, it is not uncommon to face issues such as differing site conditions, weather delays, or minor scope adjustments. The fact that the contract was completed within its duration and the award value appears to be the final value suggests that any challenges were likely managed effectively without leading to major disputes or significant cost escalations. Further investigation into contract performance reports or official project closure documentation would be needed for a definitive answer.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912HN07R0007
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2700 LAGOON PARK DR, MONTGOMERY, AL, 02
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $108,335,780
Exercised Options: $99,752,780
Current Obligation: $99,752,780
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912HN07D0052
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-09-30
Current End Date: 2010-10-13
Potential End Date: 2010-10-13 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-03-31
More Contracts from Caddell Construction CO., Inc.
- Design/Build of NEW Embassy Compound for Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic — $150.9M (Department of State)
- THE Construction of the NEW NEC in the Hague Igf::ct::igf — $134.2M (Department of State)
- Djibouti NEC Project — $125.4M (Department of State)
- 3RD Army Headquarters Building — $106.1M (Department of Defense)
- Award of NEC Desgin/Build Contract for NEW Emabssy in Bujumbura, Burundi — $103.3M (Department of State)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)