DoD's $14.3M Engineering Services Contract to BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,342,333 ($14.3M)

Contractor: Bastion Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-09-30

End Date: 2020-09-29

Contract Duration: 2,191 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: INITIAL AWARD

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35898

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.3 million to BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: INITIAL AWARD Key points: 1. Contract awarded for engineering services, indicating a need for specialized technical expertise. 2. The contract was competed fully and openly, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract (2191 days) points to a long-term requirement for these services. 4. The award was made to BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a specific contractor for this service. 5. The contract falls under the Engineering Services NAICS code (541330). 6. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the DoD. 7. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific $14.3 million contract for engineering services is challenging without more detailed scope information and comparable contract data. Time and Materials contracts, while flexible, can present risks for cost control compared to fixed-price agreements. The number of bids received (4) is a moderate indicator of competition, but the final price relative to the estimated value or market rates for similar engineering services would be needed for a more definitive assessment of value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a 'Full and Open Competition' procurement strategy. This means that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data indicates that four bids were received. A full and open competition is generally expected to yield the best prices and terms for the government due to the widest possible pool of potential offerors.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and ensures that the government is not limited to a select few providers, potentially leading to cost savings.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and potentially other Department of Defense entities requiring engineering expertise. The services delivered are engineering services, which could encompass a wide range of technical support, design, analysis, and consulting. The geographic impact is likely concentrated in Alabama (ST: AL, SN: ALABAMA), where the contractor is located, or wherever the Army's projects requiring these services are based. The contract supports a workforce of engineers and technical specialists employed by BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Engineering services represent a significant sector within government contracting, supporting a wide array of federal agencies. This contract for $14.3 million falls within the typical range for specialized engineering support. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise across various disciplines. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific engineering disciplines required, but this award suggests a substantial, long-term need.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SS: false, SB: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically mandated for small businesses through a set-aside program for this particular award. The primary contractor, BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., would determine any subcontracting opportunities based on their own business strategy and project needs.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the contract's statement of work. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance data may be less accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, bastion-technologies-inc, full-and-open-competition, time-and-materials, alabama, naics-541330, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.3 million to BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. INITIAL AWARD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-09-30. End: 2020-09-29.

What is the specific nature of the engineering services provided under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Engineering Services' under NAICS code 541330. However, the specific nature of these services is not detailed. This could range from civil, mechanical, electrical, or aerospace engineering to systems engineering, technical consulting, or project management support. Without a detailed Statement of Work (SOW) or task orders, it's impossible to ascertain the precise engineering disciplines or project objectives. Further investigation into the contract's documentation would be required to understand the scope, such as whether it involves design, analysis, testing, or operational support for military systems or infrastructure.

How does the $14.3 million value compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?

Comparing the $14.3 million value requires context regarding the duration and scope of the services. For a contract spanning approximately six years (2191 days), this equates to roughly $2.2 million per year. The Department of the Army procures a vast array of engineering services, from large-scale infrastructure design to specialized technical support for weapon systems. Without knowing the specific engineering domain (e.g., IT, construction, defense systems), it's difficult to benchmark. However, for long-term, specialized engineering support, this value appears moderate. A more precise comparison would involve analyzing contracts with similar NAICS codes, durations, and service complexities awarded within the same fiscal periods.

What are the key risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract of this magnitude and duration?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials contract, especially one valued at $14.3 million over six years, is cost control. T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified hourly rates and for the actual cost of materials. This structure can incentivize longer task durations and potentially less efficient work if not rigorously monitored. For the government, this means the final cost can exceed initial estimates, unlike fixed-price contracts where the price is set upfront. Effective oversight, detailed tracking of hours and materials, and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value.

What does the level of competition (4 bidders) suggest about the contractor's market position and potential pricing?

Receiving four bids in a full and open competition suggests a moderately competitive market for these specific engineering services. While more than a sole-source or limited competition, four bidders might not represent the maximum possible competition. This level could indicate that the market is neither overly saturated nor highly restricted. For taxpayers, it suggests that the government likely received a reasonable range of pricing options. However, without knowing the specific technical requirements and the number of potential qualified firms in the market, it's hard to definitively say if four bidders led to the absolute lowest possible price. A higher number of bidders often correlates with more aggressive pricing.

What is BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s track record with the Department of Defense, particularly for engineering services?

BASTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. has secured a $14.3 million contract for engineering services from the Department of the Army, indicating a positive track record with the DoD. This award suggests they possess the necessary qualifications, past performance, and competitive pricing to be selected. To fully assess their track record, one would need to examine their contract history with the DoD, including the types of services rendered, contract values, performance reviews, and any past issues or successes. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases would reveal the extent and nature of their previous work for defense agencies.

How has federal spending on engineering services (NAICS 541330) trended over the past five years, and where does this contract fit?

Federal spending on engineering services (NAICS 541330) has generally been substantial, driven by defense, infrastructure, and research needs. While specific year-over-year trends fluctuate based on budget allocations and major program requirements, the overall demand remains consistent. This $14.3 million contract, awarded in 2014 and ending in 2020, represents a portion of that spending. Its significance lies in its duration and the specific agency (Department of the Army). To place it accurately within trends, one would need to analyze aggregate spending data for NAICS 541330 across all federal agencies for the relevant fiscal years to see if this contract's value was typical or an outlier for its time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 17625 EL CAMINO REAL STE 330, HOUSTON, TX, 77058

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,786,450

Exercised Options: $14,342,333

Current Obligation: $14,342,333

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W31P4Q14A0032

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-09-30

Current End Date: 2020-09-29

Potential End Date: 2020-09-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-15

More Contracts from Bastion Technologies, Inc.

View all Bastion Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending