DoD's $47.1M Booz Allen Hamilton Contract for Consulting Services: A Deep Dive

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $47,142,097 ($47.1M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-05-01

End Date: 2015-11-29

Contract Duration: 2,038 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OBLIGATE CONTRACT MINIMUM GUARANTEE

Place of Performance

Location: TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH County, FLORIDA, 33621

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $47.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: OBLIGATE CONTRACT MINIMUM GUARANTEE Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton for administrative and management consulting. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is substantial, spanning over 2000 days. 4. The primary sector is professional services, specifically management consulting. 5. The contract value is significant, indicating a substantial investment in consulting expertise.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $47.1M for consulting services appears reasonable given the duration and the provider's reputation. Benchmarking against similar large-scale consulting contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically leads to better price discovery and value for the government. This method allows all qualified vendors to bid, fostering a competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for professional consulting services, with the expectation of improved operational efficiency and strategic guidance for the Special Operations Command.

Public Impact

Supports U.S. Special Operations Command's mission with critical management and administrative consulting. Ensures access to specialized expertise for complex operational challenges. The contract's duration suggests a long-term need for these services. Transparency in procurement through full and open competition is a positive for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management and general management consulting. Spending in this area is common across government agencies for specialized expertise, strategic planning, and operational improvements. Benchmarks for similar contracts would depend on the specific services rendered and the agency's scale.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false). While large contracts often go to prime contractors, opportunities for small businesses may exist as subcontractors to Booz Allen Hamilton.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's duration and value necessitate robust oversight to ensure performance, cost control, and adherence to the statement of work. Regular performance reviews and audits are crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, fl, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $47.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. OBLIGATE CONTRACT MINIMUM GUARANTEE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $47.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-05-01. End: 2015-11-29.

What specific deliverables or outcomes were expected from Booz Allen Hamilton under this contract, and how was their performance measured against these expectations?

The contract details focus on the obligation and minimum guarantee, not specific deliverables. Performance measurement would typically involve key performance indicators (KPIs) tied to the consulting services provided, such as project completion, quality of analysis, and impact on operational efficiency. The government contracting officer would be responsible for monitoring these metrics and ensuring Booz Allen Hamilton met the agreed-upon standards throughout the contract's lifecycle.

Given the $47.1M value and long duration, what were the primary risks identified during the procurement process, and what mitigation strategies were put in place?

Primary risks likely included contractor performance, cost overruns, and potential misalignment of services with evolving mission needs. Mitigation strategies would involve detailed performance work statements, regular progress reviews, clear invoicing procedures, and potentially contract clauses allowing for adjustments or termination if performance falters. The full and open competition itself acts as a risk mitigation by selecting a capable vendor.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayers in securing these consulting services for SOCOM?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages high-quality service offerings. The success in achieving best value depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the responsiveness of bidders, and the government's evaluation criteria. Assuming a robust competition, it likely provided a strong basis for securing necessary consulting expertise at a competitive market rate.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: H9222209R0034

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $47,142,097

Exercised Options: $47,142,097

Current Obligation: $47,142,097

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: H9222210D0016

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-05-01

Current End Date: 2015-11-29

Potential End Date: 2015-11-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2015-12-22

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending