DoD awards $13.9M Engineering Services contract to University of Dayton via full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,901,368 ($13.9M)
Contractor: University of Dayton
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2000-03-31
End Date: 2001-09-01
Contract Duration: 519 days
Daily Burn Rate: $26.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Place of Performance
Location: DAYTON, MONTGOMERY County, OHIO, 45469
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.9 million to UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to University of Dayton for engineering services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized for this award. 3. The contract value is $13,901,368. 4. The contract duration is 519 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.9M for engineering services over 519 days appears within a reasonable range for specialized technical support. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition suggests a robust price discovery process. This method allows multiple qualified vendors to bid, theoretically driving down costs and ensuring fair market pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome compared to non-competitive methods.
Public Impact
Supports critical engineering services for the Department of the Air Force. The competitive award process benefits taxpayers by promoting efficiency. Potential for technological advancements stemming from university research and development.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) can incentivize cost overruns if not closely monitored.
- Limited duration may indicate a specific project scope, requiring future contracts for ongoing needs.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition ensures broad market access and potential for best value.
- Award to a university may leverage specialized research and development capabilities.
Sector Analysis
Engineering services are crucial for defense projects, encompassing design, analysis, and testing. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on project complexity and technological requirements.
Small Business Impact
This contract was awarded to a university, not a small business. There is no indication of small business participation or subcontracting in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Air Force managed this procurement. Oversight would focus on ensuring the university meets performance requirements and manages costs effectively under the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type carries inherent risk of cost overruns.
- Lack of specific detail on the engineering services provided.
- Potential for schedule delays due to academic institution's operational cadence.
- No clear indication of small business subcontracting opportunities.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, oh, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.9 million to UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-03-31. End: 2001-09-01.
What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Air Force's mission objectives?
The contract, NAICS code 541330, covers engineering services. While specific details are not provided, these typically include design, development, testing, and analysis for complex systems. For the Air Force, this could range from aircraft component design to advanced weapons system integration, directly supporting operational readiness and technological superiority.
What were the key factors that led to the selection of the University of Dayton, and were there any potential risks associated with awarding to an academic institution?
The selection likely stemmed from the University of Dayton's specialized expertise, research capabilities, or existing relationship with the DoD. Potential risks include academic schedules potentially impacting project timelines, differing administrative processes compared to traditional contractors, and ensuring the translation of research into practical, deployable solutions.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type compare to other potential contract types for this type of engineering service in terms of cost control and risk allocation?
CPFF is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined, allowing flexibility. However, it carries a risk of cost overruns as the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs plus a fixed fee. Other types like Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) offer better cost certainty for the government but require a well-defined scope, while Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF) can incentivize performance and cost savings.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 300 COLLEGE PARK AVE, DAYTON, OH, 10
Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $6,045,947
Exercised Options: $6,045,947
Current Obligation: $13,901,368
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F4262000D0039
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-03-31
Current End Date: 2001-09-01
Potential End Date: 2001-09-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-02-23
More Contracts from University of Dayton
- Sustainment and Combat Readiness Capabilities (sabr-C) — $95.1M (Department of Defense)
- EO14042 Soaring Otter — $93.5M (Department of Defense)
- Epse IV TO30 AM ADD Manuf and Cold Spray Support — $57.3M (General Services Administration)
- Advanced Materials and Processes — $50.0M (Department of Defense)
- Pervasive Research and Evaluation for Complex-Solutions in Operational and Urgent Systems Task Order 0001 — $44.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)